OK, it has finally come to this ;-)

First, check out this modern abomination of many guitars:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ARQsw4ml8g

(Note that one puny bongo drum, played lightly by an inexpert player, can 
easily cover up the sound of 50+ classical guitars.)

Then there's this example of a steel string guitar in classical music:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GE-q7zTX7LE

(The guitar is tuned high to low: E-C-F#-D-G-C.)

How would a lute do?

Chris

--- On Sun, 12/20/09, Christopher Stetson <cstet...@smith.edu> wrote:

> From: Christopher Stetson <cstet...@smith.edu>
> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Liuto forte
> To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
> Date: Sunday, December 20, 2009, 5:24 PM
>    Hi, all.
> 
>    Clearly now is the time to put this out
> to the list:
> 
>    [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6wcIOSC-u0
> 
>    That's me on the right in the
> (unamplified) classical guitar trio.  You
>    can see my pinkie creepin' down to the
> soundboard.  I played electric
>    with pick for most of the concert. 
> It was fun.
> 
>    But don't get on me about Peter's
> "archguitar."  You'll have to talk to
>    him about that.
> 
>    Best,
> 
>    Chris.
>    >>> <chriswi...@yahoo.com>
> 12/20/2009 10:54 AM >>>
>    Mark,
>    --- On Sun, 12/20/09, terli...@aol.com
> <terli...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>    > From: terli...@aol.com
> <terli...@aol.com>
>    > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Liuto forte
>    > To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
>    > Date: Sunday, December 20, 2009,
> 9:30 AM
>    >
>    >
>    > I write at the risk of being gummed
> to death by a horde of
>    > irate lutenists:
>    >
>    Nope.  I'm not anti-classical guitar
> at all.  I consider myself a
>    musician who chooses the right tool for
> the job.  Much as I love
>    theorbo or baroque lute, there's lots of
> music for which these
>    instruments are totally unsuitable. 
> Same with guitar.
>    >
>    > I don't know what kind of guitars
> and guitar playing
>    > lutenists here have been exposed to
> here but there is a wide
>    > variety of types of guitars and
> playing styles.
>    >
>    I totally agree!  As mentioned in my
> last message, I believe classical
>    players should even expand their horizons
> to include steel-string and
>    electric guitars in a classical
> context.  Nice as the nylon guitar is,
>    this is such an easy way to extend the
> dynamic and tonal range of the
>    guitar to nearly orchestral proportions.
>    I have a master's degree in classical
> guitar from highly regarded
>    conservatory.  My main area of
> emphasis was on contemporary music.
>    I've written a lot of music for it and
> continue to write for it.
>    Nowadays I only compose solo music for
> the nylon-string guitar for the
>    reasons outlined in my last message: a
> modern guitar is built for the
>    purpose of bringing forth a full, rich
> sonic spectrum.  Nice.  However,
>    much of this charm gets lost when other
> instruments with greater
>    emphasis on higher partials are
> employed.  So why use it in chamber
>    music when other types of guitars exist
> which do bring out the higher
>    partials?
>    > Hauser style
>    > guitar guitars are very good for
> playing some lute music.
>    > Smallman type guitars are less good
> for playing most lute
>    > music. To play lute music decently
> on guitar takes a certain
>    > touch...there are players that can
> do it.
>    True.  I have no problem with
> guitarists playing lute music, but I'm
>    not very interested in doing it myself
> for the same reason I don't play
>    Villa-Lobos on my 13-course.  At the
> same time folks should keep in
>    mind that the nylon-string classical
> guitar as we know it only came
>    into being circa 1950.
>    > The guitar (unamplified) works great
> great in ensemble
>    > playing e.g Boulez: Le marteau sans
> maitre: Webern op.18,
>    > Takemitsu: Ring for Lute,flute and
> guitar..
>    I haven't really found so.  Even in
> something like Takemitsu's "Toward
>    the Sea" the guitar is outshined by the
> delicate alto flute.  The soft
>    alto flute tosses off these gentle waves
> of sound while us poor
>    guitarists are fighting to slam out every
> note.  I've seen these works
>    performed with amplified guitars but
> things always sound so boomy to
>    me.
>    Already with Webern we may ask ourselves
> what exactly the appropriate
>    instrument really is.  The
> Stauffer-style type of guitar construction
>    remained current in Austria well into the
> 1920's.  Certainly the
>    heavily-built nylon string instrument is
> out!  I would love to research
>    the status of the guitar in early
> 20th-century Vienna.  There's a new
>    idea: Second Viennese Performance
> Practice!
>    > Best,
>    > Mark Delpriora
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    > -----Original Message-----
>    > From: chriswi...@yahoo.com
>    > To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu;
>    > Sauvage Valery <sauvag...@orange.fr>
>    > Sent: Sat, Dec 19, 2009 6:18 pm
>    > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Liuto forte
>    >
>    >
>    > Valery,
>    >
>    > --- On Sat, 12/19/09, Sauvage Valery
> <sauvag...@orange.fr>
>    > wrote:
>    > > Ok forte,
>    > > we can hear it, but sounds like
> a guitar (single
>    > strung for
>    > > the one he used).
>    > > So why not play the guitar ?
> modern and loud
>    > instrument you
>    > > can play with nails...
>    >
>    > Really?  I've found the modern
> classical guitar to be
>    > a really, really awful
>    > ensemble instrument when dealing
> with anything else other
>    > than other classical
>    > guitars or one other
> instrument/voice.  While the
>    > signal coming from it may be
>    > technically louder than most types
> of lutes, it is designed
>    > to emphasize the
>    > lower partials so that the sound is
> literally swallowed up
>    > by other modern
>    > instruments.  This sort of dark
> timbre can be very
>    > effective for a certain
>    > portion (but not all) of the solo
> repertoire, but it really
>    > loses its charm in
>    > other situations.  This is why
> A) it MUST be played
>    > with nails B) even then it
>    > doesn't project particularly well
> and C) you often hear the
>    > instrument amplified
>    > in even small ensembles.
>    >
>    > If you're going to amplify it,
> what's the point of using
>    > that type of guitar
>    > (unless you want to make the
> amplification part of the
>    > effect and timbre itself,
>    > a la George Crumb)?  This is
> why I haven't used a
>    > classical guitar in any of my
>    > ensemble music for years.  A
> steel-string guitar works
>    > very well unamplified in
>    > a small ensemble and the electric
> guitar has no volume
>    > limitations at all.
>    > Contemporary composers would find
> much of interest in these
>    > instruments and
>    > modern classical guitarists would be
> well advised to think
>    > of them as alternate
>    > versions of their instrument.
> Unfortunately, classical
>    > players often perceive
>    > them as some kind of threat from
> outside the "official"
>    > guitar world.
>    >
>    > I haven't found this same problem
> with lutes or
>    > theorbos.  The emphasis of
>    > higher partials means that the sound
> on both can cut
>    > through quite well.  Play
>    > close to the bridge and you can be
> heard most of the
>    > time.  I've been thinking
>    > of writing a duo for lute and modern
> guitar.  Maybe
>    > now's the time to
>    > investigate the project.
>    >
>    > Chris
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    > > ----- Original Message -----
> From: "wolfgang wiehe"
>    > <wie-w...@gmx.de>
>    > > To: <terli...@aol.com>;
>    > > <r.turov...@verizon.net>;
>    > > <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>    > > Sent: Saturday, December 19,
> 2009 8:05 PM
>    > > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Liuto
> forte
>    > >
>    > >
>    > >
>    > > I heard a "liuto forte" this
> year at our DLG meeting
>    > on
>    > > "Burg
>    > > Sternberg". Hmm, not louder
> than my g-lute...;-)
>    > > Greetings
>    > > W.
>    > >
>    > > -----Urspruengliche
> Nachricht-----
>    > > Von: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
>    > > [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu]
>    > > Im
>    > > Auftrag von terli...@aol.com
>    > > Gesendet: Samstag, 19. Dezember
> 2009 19:41
>    > > An: r.turov...@verizon.net;
>    > > lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
>    > > Betreff: [LUTE] Re: Liuto
> forte
>    > >
>    > >
>    > > OR suitable for a guitarist who
> is NOT sick of the
>    > guitar
>    > > repertoire!
>    > > . and is happy with finger
> nails.
>    > >
>    > >
>    > > Roman, Did you go to the the
> demonstration of the
>    > liuto
>    > > forte hat
>    > > occurred at the Met Museum a
> year or 3 ago?
>    > >
>    > >
>    > > I missed it.
>    > >
>    > >
>    > > Mark Delpriora
>    > >
>    > >
>    > >
>    > > -----Original Message-----
>    > > From: Roman Turovsky <r.turov...@verizon.net>
>    > > To: Lutelist <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>    > > Sent: Sat, Dec 19, 2009 11:51
> am
>    > > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Liuto
> forte
>    > >
>    > >
>    > > It is a single-strung lute and
> guitar hybrid designed
>    > by
>    > > Andre Burguete,
>    > > that aproximates lute sound
> while purporting to have
>    > the
>    > > volume of the
>    > > guitar. It uses nylon overspun
> with fine steel wire,
>    > and
>    > > has some
>    > > interesting and useful
> peculiarities in the bridge
>    > and
>    > > soundboard
>    > > construction.
>    > > Fixed metal frets are
> supposedly less dampening to
>    > the
>    > > sound
>    > > (negligibly).
>    > > This technology might yield a
> nice and loud theorbo in
>    > ET.
>    > > But one really misses the
> overtone palette of double
>    > > strings.
>    > > It is a very suitable
> instrument for a guitarist who
>    > is
>    > > sick of the
>    > > guitar repertoire, but is
> unwilling to part with his
>    > > nails.
>    > >
>    > > [2]http://www.liuto-forte.com/
>    > > There are a number of notable
> converts to it: Oliver
>    > > Holzenburg, Luciano
>    > > Contini et al.
>    > > RT
>    > >
>    > > ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Winheld"
>    > > <dwinh...@comcast.net>
>    > > To: <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>    > > Sent: Saturday, December 19,
> 2009 11:31 AM
>    > > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Liuto
> forte
>    > >
>    > > > Alright,  I'll bite-
> What in God's name is
>    > Liuto
>    > > Forte? (I must have
>    > > > been out of the office for
> this one)
>    > > > thanks,  Dan
>    > > > -- >
>    > > >
>    > > >
>    > > >
>    > > > To get on or off this list
> see list information
>    > at
>    > > > [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>    > > >
>    > >
>    > >
>    > >
>    > > --
>    > >
>    > >
>    > >
>    > >
>    > >
>    > >
>    > >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    > --
>    >
> 
>    To get on or off this list see list
> information at
>    [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 
>    --
> 
> References
> 
>    1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6wcIOSC-u0
>    2. http://www.liuto/
>    3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute
>    4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute
> 
> 






To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to