>Many years ago, one of our famous colleagues
   >gave a concert at Carnegie Recital Hall in New York, and one of our
   >other learned colleagues* accosted him afterwards in the green room,
   >launching immediately into a detailed critique of everything he did
   >wrong, that could be improved, and how- but the performer shushed him
   >in mid-sentence and said "NOT NOW, damn it! Talk to me tomorrow, if
   >you must!" Even if the criticism is well meant, there is always a
   >proper time, way, and place.
   It's hard to determine "the proper time" to potentially make a person
   sad and evoke that "tundra-esque" reaction David talked about...
   sometimes one should simply leave it or utter a friendly "white" lie, I
   agree. But as it seems one has to ask one self how honest one is with
   one's urge to utter this and that... (difficult, I know...:-) The
   above critic - if I got the story right - intruded the post-concert
   celebration with inpolite and harsh negativity only, made himself
   important in the most inadequate way to the poor artist - who certainly
   had a right to be proud and happy and have a wondeful time in the first
   place after having performed at such a prestigious place, it probably
   was a big event for him.

   Regarding postings on YouTube, I would say however, if and only if
   someone has an interesting contribution to make, he or she should do
   it, but try do offer his or her best in the given circumstances. For
   instance, putting some rare Conradi-Stuff on the net is almost in
   itself a good thing. But, say, a teenager who just managed to
   stutter an a-minor chord on his guitar should certainly not be
   encouraged to put the 10000000000th "cover version" of Angie on the
   net... to the effect that you will never be able to find a
   really interesting new version. I often look for this and that in
   YouTube, and often have to waste quite some time to struggle
   through mediocre recordings until I find something interesting and
   inspiring, if at all. Just yesterday I looked how interesting people
   might play a certain piece by Thomas Robinson. There was one stuttered
   boring version, with the player admitting that he did neither think
   much of it nor practice the piece... so why not, was my reaction, and
   was a little angry about him...  Other people invest a lot of time,
   effort and intelligence to make worthwhile postings...

   Cheers
   F

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to