So do I. Generally there are 2 schools of recording: 1/with lots of mics
to catch various plans of the room acoustics which gives later bigger
choices in mixing 2/purist - just pair of stereo mics to sound as
natural as possible. I prefer the latter. Please have a look at the
spacing of mics on the photo of my live, stereo recording with Didrik
DeGeer microphones and preamps
http://www.peregrinerecords.com/Pages/Info%20About%20What%20Thing%20Is%20Love.html
These mics are incredibly sensitive and takes from the wooden chapel
sound better then those recorded later in the stone church (it's just my
taste), but both reproduce natural acoustics of the places we were
recording quite faithfully.
Jaroslaw
W dniu 2010-04-02 19:07, Jean-Marie Poirier pisze:
I totally concur, Ned ! 2 excellent mics and proper acoustics are largely
sufficient for a lute !
Jean-Marie
=================================
== En réponse au message du 02-04-2010, 16:55:11 ==
Well, recorded sound is a matter of taste, to be sure (it seems clear
that there is no reference for "good" recorded sound). But I would be
curious as to why dt feels so many - 6 or more - mics are necessary for
recording a single instrument. Whether it's multi-micing or too
much reverb - artificial or natural - that destroys the dall'Aauila CD,
I think it represents a cautionary example of misguided recording
engineering.
Ned
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail.
Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
========================================
Nˆ ¶‰è®‡ß¶¬–+-±ç¥ŠËbú+™«b¢v†Ûiÿü0ÁË j»f¢ëayÛ¿Á·?–ë^iÙ¢Ÿø§uìatml=
