Arto-

Some instruments can tolerate, and will respond to synthetics better 
than others; I am particularly lucky with my archlute-  nylon 1st & 
2nd, carbon for 3, 4, and 5; and almost tolerable copper overspun 
basses. low tension (I follow Toyohiko Satoh's recommendations) and 
careful touch are particularly important; less leeway for sloppy 
technique than with good gut.

I have ended my 11 year love affair with nylgut. Ed Martin and dt are 
right, they are Satan's strings- two courses of which are still 
polluting my 6-course. My other instruments are in gut except for the 
archlute-

Every lute player should have a bad guitar for fun & games. Mine is a 
7 string, steel-string flat top acoustic; purchased on a whim while 
waiting delivery of my "Chambure" vihuela from Barber & Harris back 
in 2002. It cost about half the price of the Kingham case for the 
vihuela. In spite of a 64.5 cm sl I have it right up to G, a=440; 
average string tension about 10 kg. per string. That's somewhat on 
the light side for modern steel-string guitars. Plain steel first 
four, bottom three overspun (7th string at low D)- Thomastik-Infeld. 
Sounds far, far better than it has any right to sound. ET frets and 
some unnecessary mother of pearl are the only real drawbacks. It 
certainly doesn't sound like a lute whether good or bad, maybe it 
sounds like a bad Orpharion- or a really good one.

Dan


>Some synthetic strings sound better than others. The nylgut to my ear
>has a lot of out of tune harmonics, so gut to me sounds much better
>than nylgut.
>But nylgut is so convenient!
>High quality nylon and some carbon strings can sound good, but there
>are a lot of junky synthetics in carbon and nylon as well.
>
>Of course, this is personal preference, some ppl like nylgut, and so on.
>You can't go wrong with good quality gut strings of course, and bad
>gut strings sound truly dreadful.
>As a former tuner, I can't tolerate out of tune partials easily, but
>then again the effect is greater on certain lutes. Many people have
>no problem with the harmonics--we all hear differently in subtle ways.
>
>Sounding like a bad guitar may not be bad--do you want the lute to
>sound like a good guitar?
>
>Lastly, perhaps your recording device cannot handle the very fast
>moving harmonics of the lute, and you need a faster microphone/preamp combo.
>dt
>
>
>
>At 01:03 PM 6/2/2010, you wrote:
>>Dear lutenists,
>>
>>there is a problem - to me at least:
>>
>>- Some time ago a certain person commented one of my "accords nouveaux"
>>"y-tubings" by words: "it sounds like a bad guitar". I was playing a
>>10-courser stringed by synthetics.
>>
>>- Since last December I have been playing an 11-courser stringed by gut. In
>>the beginning I had very harsh sound. Perhaps getting better? Not much. Who
>>knows? But REALLY enjoyable touch and feel!
>>
>>- Now the 11-courser is in "garage"; some bar(-s) is(are) loose. Eagerly
>>waiting to get it back...
>>
>>- The problem: My lutes stringed by synthetic strings sound also to me -
>>especially when recorded! - "like a bad guitar".
>>
>>Is it really so, or did I just miss the touch to synthetics?
>>
>>worried,
>>
>  >
>>
>>
>>
>>To get on or off this list see list information at
>>http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


-- 
Rachel Winheld
820 Colusa Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94707

[email protected]
Tel 510.526.0242 
Cell 510.915.4276


Reply via email to