Your points make a lot of sense, Ron.  I have read that intabulations of vocal 
music were quite common and there must have been reasons for that.  The ones 
you put forth are convincing.  I would love to hear your duo in a live 
performance.  
Best,  Ned
On Jul 6, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Ron Andrico wrote:

> Thanks for your comments, David and Ned.
> 
> We have to agree that the motet when sung in four parts is a wonderful thing. 
>  Singing polyphony is the way we met and we still love to do so when we can.
> 
> Intabulations of vocal polyphony for solo voice and lute are something 
> completely different from vocal polyphony.  Since there are so many surviving 
> historical examples of intabulations, we have been delving into what makes 
> the format unique and convincing as an alternative to all-vocal performance.  
> Three things have emerged:  The text is much clearer when sung with one 
> voice, rhythmic gesture and articulation is uniformly sharper and more easily 
> managed, and the quietness and subtlety of one voice and lute draws the 
> listener into the performance more deeply.  A fourth thing is that rehearsal 
> is more easily scheduled.
> 
> Thanks again for your kind comments and we look forward to sharing more of 
> this music very soon.
> 
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Ron & Donna
> 
> www.mignarda.com
> 
> 
> > Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Palestrina and upcoming CD
> > From: [email protected]
> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:48:28 -0400
> > CC: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > 
> > Certainly exquisite music beautifully performed. I do, though, miss hearing 
> > the sounds of all four voices sustained as they would be with four singers. 
> > The lute suggests the counterpoint while voices bring it gloriously to 
> > life. At least to my ears. (Though not a singer, I admit that I'd love to 
> > be one!). But, again, I think your realization of the music is sensitively 
> > and beautifully done. Thank you for posting it.
> > Ned
> > On Jul 6, 2010, at 7:33 AM, David R wrote:
> > 
> > > Both selections: very nice! I like the way the Palestrina works as a lute 
> > > song.
> > > 
> > > DavidR
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Jul 5, 2010, at 7:42 PM, Ron Andrico wrote:
> > > 
> > >> To all:
> > >> We would like to share this performance of Palestrina's motet, Sicut
> > >> cervus for solo voice and lute, recorded in our favorite venue, St.
> > >> Stanislaus in Cleveland, Ohio.
> > >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUDplApE45U
> > >> And from a related project, we have an audio clip from our new CD of
> > >> motets by Spanish composers, due to be released next month.
> > >> http://www.mignarda.com/HarmoniaCaelestis/
> > >> Best wishes,
> > >> Ron & Donna
> > >> www.mignarda.com
> > >> __________________________________________________________________
> > >> 
> > >> Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from
> > >> your inbox. [1]See how. --
> > >> 
> > >> References
> > >> 
> > >> 1. 
> > >> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> To get on or off this list see list information at
> > >> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with 
> Hotmail. Get busy. =


--

Reply via email to