Thank you for this story, Graham.

My guess is that the agents were looking for a CITES violation;  that 
is, the convention of international trade of endangered species 
act.  I have a lute which contains ivory and Brazillian rosewood, and 
I would never consider attempting bringing it over a border.

ed





At 08:38 AM 11/1/2010, Graham Freeman wrote:
>    Dear Collective Wisdom,
>    A few weeks ago, I sent out a message soliciting advice concerning
>    selling my theorbo on the lute list. Many of you replied promptly with
>    some excellent advice, and I'm very grateful. Thank you to everyone who
>    replied. I have sold my beautiful theorbo to a good home where it will
>    be fed well and kept warm.
>    Also, I might impart to you the cautionary tale of its transport. It
>    was sent by UPS from Toronto to New York, and the shipping was prepaid
>    by the buyer. After getting to Buffalo quite quickly, it was then held
>    at US Customs for more than a week. Every day it was sent back and
>    forth between the UPS office and the Customs office trying to get
>    approval to get it through Customs. The problem seemed to be the Lacey
>    Act, a measure originally meant to interrupt the trafficking in animals
>    but expanded in 2008 to include plants and plant products, such as
>    wood. The fact that the instrument was made of wood (combined with some
>    poor Customs official opening it up and having no idea what it might
>    be) made it very suspicious to the great thinkers they hire at Customs.
>    I had to contact the luthier to verify where all the wood had been
>    sourced, the buyer had to obtain power of attorney over the instrument
>    and sign a document verifying the origin of the wood, etc. I was very
>    fortunate that the buyer was extremely well-versed in this sort of
>    thing, but it took an enormous amount of effort just to get it to its
>    destination. After the many dozens of times it must have been taken out
>    and inspected by people who didn't know what they were doing, I was
>    perhaps fortunate that the only damage it sustained was some minor
>    damage to a tuning peg. The most inconvenient and worrying part, of
>    course, was that the instrument was being held in storage, probably
>    with no consideration for the fragility of the instrument at all, for
>    more than a week.
>    The moral of the story, I suppose, is that if you are trying to sell or
>    ship your instrument to the US from another country, make sure you have
>    researched the laws concerning imports into the US, especially of wood
>    products, and have some documentation from your luthier concerning the
>    woods that were used and where they were sourced, and gets LOTS of
>    insurance for the trip. It might not even hurt to get the advice of a
>    lawyer or importer in the US who has experience with these things. I
>    was fortunate in that respect, but not everyone will be.
>    Once again, thank you to everyone for your advice, and I hope my little
>    tale saves someone else the stress and trouble it caused me.
>    Best,
>    Graham Freeman
>    --
>    Dr. Graham Freeman
>    Ph. D Musicology
>    University of Toronto
>    [1][email protected]
>    --
>
>References
>
>    1. mailto:[email protected]
>
>
>To get on or off this list see list information at
>http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota  55812
e-mail:  [email protected]
voice:  (218) 728-1202
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
http://www.myspace.com/edslute



Reply via email to