Bear in mind the date - 1701. Certainly later in the 18th century large
   lutes were quite common (ie string lengths over 72cm, typically around
   76cm but even larger), but extant examples of 11 course (either
   renecked etc instruments or new around then), contemporary
   measurement and iconography seem to suggest 70-72cm as usual for a
   'proper common' lute around this time. I think my calculation of the
   smaller lutes was simply working back from this as the basis. Clearly
   they were pretty rare even then so few, if any, might have survived.
   I'll dig out my working papers.

   MH

   PS the only statement (singular) I recanted was that R's musical
   compositions were of  'negligible' quality ..............
   --- On Sun, 7/11/10, Edward Martin <[email protected]> wrote:

     From: Edward Martin <[email protected]>
     Subject: Re: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Wenzel von Radolt
     To: "Martyn Hodgson" <[email protected]>,
     [email protected], "Edward Martin"
     <[email protected]>, "Bernd Haegemann" <[email protected]>,
     "Christopher Wilke" <[email protected]>
     Date: Sunday, 7 November, 2010, 15:49

   Thanks to all who have responded to this inquiry.  Yes, the recording
   is certainly pleasant, and I do think it could be worth the effort to
   perform a concerto or 2.
   Martyn,  you say that you have recanted some of the statements you
   wrote in the article...I agree, in that it is worthy music.
   Back to my question of the mensurs of the lutes required to perform
   this music......
   Andreas states the pitches of the top strings are:
   Lute 1 f1
   Lute 2 eb1
   Lute 3 c1
   And he further states the Vienna a1 was in this time around 470 Hz!
   Small Baroque lutes are known, f.ex. Andreas Berr 1699 with 65.1 petit
   jeu and 72.0 grand jeu.
   Your size chart provides:
   Small                   54 cm
   Middle                  61 cm
   Proper common   72 cm
   If a is indeed 470 in Vienna at the time, 54 cm still seems quite short
   for a soprano in f1.  I haven't done the calculations, but you may be
   correct.
   Are there any icongraphical examples, or surviving instruments, of very
   small baroque lutes?  There certainly are surviving examples of large
   baroque lutes;  the Edlinger in South Dakota comes to mind at 82 cm.
   ed
   At 09:09 AM 11/7/2010, Martyn Hodgson wrote:
   >
   > You are quite right to take me to task me for pronouncing too hard on
   von Radolt's compositions: in fact I recanted quite some time ago(see
   later FoMRHI and, indeed, this list!)!   As you say, not the deepest of
   stuff but pleasant enough and a change from much of the lute composers'
   works at the time.
   >
   > MH
   >
   > --- On Sun, 7/11/10, Christopher Wilke <[1][email protected]>
   wrote:
   >
   > From: Christopher Wilke <[2][email protected]>
   > Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Wenzel von Radolt
   > To: [3][email protected], "Edward Martin"
   <[[email protected]>, "Martyn Hodgson"
   <[5][email protected]>, "Bernd Haegemann" <[[email protected]>
   > Date: Sunday, 7 November, 2010, 14:41
   >
   > Bernd,
   >
   >     Thanks for the link.  And thanks very much to Martyn for writing
   the article.  Very interesting and informative stuff.  I wonder why
   Radolt has received so little attention.
   >
   >     On one point, though, I can't agree with Martyn: von Radolt's
   music is not of "negligible musical worth."  I won't argue that it is
   the deepest stuff, but it is pleasant to listen to and there are some
   surprises to keep you interested.  Overall, I would recommend the
   recording that Ed mentioned by Ars Antiqua Austria although I find the
   violin to be a bit too forward in the recorded mix.  They definitely
   did not follow Radolt's explicit instruction that "the soprano part
   that is the small lute must at all times be set strongly" and tripled
   in volume in relation to the other parts. (I suppose they were after an
   "overall composite sound.")
   >
   >     Actually, I know very little about this recording.  I bought it
   on iTunes about a year ago and there is no booklet (shame on them!).  I
   could hear that there was more than one lute on there, but the
   performers' names are not even listed online.  How hard is it to
   include a digital booklet, people?
   >
   > Chris
   >
   >
   >
   > Christopher Wilke
   > Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer
   > www.christopherwilke.com
   >
   >
   > --- On Sun, 11/7/10, Bernd Haegemann
   <<[7]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>[8...@s
   ymbol4.de> wrote:
   >
   > > From: Bernd Haegemann
   <<[9]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>[10]bh@
   symbol4.de>
   > > Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Wenzel von Radolt
   > > To:
   <[11]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   outh.edu>[12][email protected], "Edward Martin"
   <<[13]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>
   [[email protected]>, "Martyn Hodgson"
   <<[15]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.
   co.uk>[16][email protected]>
   > > Date: Sunday, November 7, 2010, 4:40 AM
   > >
   > > >   See my paper in FoMRHI Quarterly No
   > > 44 July 1986 C-737 :  'Von Radolt's
   > > >   instructions to lute players (Wien
   > > 1701)'
   > > >
   > > >   This gives a translation of the
   > > instructions and a commentary on the
   > > >   lute sizes/pitches required.
   > >
   > >
   > >
   > >
   > > see
   > >
   > >
   <[17]http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-044.pdf>[18]http://
   www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-044.pdf
   > >
   > >
   > > B
   > >
   > >
   > >
   > > To get on or off this list see list information at
   > >
   <[19]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html>[20]http://
   www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   > >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   >
   Edward Martin
   2817 East 2nd Street
   Duluth, Minnesota  55812
   e-mail:  [[email protected]
   voice:  (218) 728-1202
   [22]http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
   [23]http://www.myspace.com/edslute

   --

References

   1. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   2. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   3. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   4. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   5. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   6. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   7. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   8. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   9. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  10. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  11. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  12. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  13. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  14. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  15. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  16. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  17. http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-044.pdf
  18. http://www.fomrhi.org/uploads/bulletins/Fomrhi-044.pdf
  19. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  20. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  21. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  22. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
  23. http://www.myspace.com/edslute

Reply via email to