Thanks Martin, a great idea, I'll get out my felt pens immediately!
   Oh, will any sort do?
   Best wishes
   Anthony
   ---- Message d'origine ----
   >De : "Martin Shepherd" <[email protected]>
   >A : "Lute List" <[email protected]>
   >Objet : [LUTE] Re: KF (coloured) Harp strings and other position
   indicators
   >Date : 12/12/2010 11:27:12 CET
   >
   >Forget bits of bone, tippex, etc. - Gordon Gergory showed me the easy
   > way a few years ago - just colour a little bit of the fret itself
   with a
   > felt-tip pen!
   >
   > Martin
   >
   > P.S. I also know some people put a little mark on one or more theorbo
   > basses about halfway along the string. By pushing the string with
   your
   > thumb you can check which bass it's resting on as well.
   >
   > On 12/12/2010 08:59, Anthony Hind wrote:
   > > Or you could just use the different colours as "place markers".
   When
   > I
   > > first began playing the Baroque lute, I had a gimped string in
   > seventh
   > > position, and both its sound and colour helped me know where I was.
   > > Now, I only have red loaded basses, so I don't have such an
   > indicator.
   > > I imagine that may be what harpist use the colours for (unless they
   > > indicate differences in tension). I believe Dan Larson also makes
   > > different coloured Lyons for use as position markers.
   > > $
   > > Incidentally, how many of you have some sort of position markings
   on
   > > 5th and 7th frets. I know of several players, who have their lute
   > maker
   > > add a bone marker directly on the side of the fret board, but I put
   a
   > > very small dot of white marker in that position. In this, I am just
   > > copying what I saw on someone else's lute.
   > > $
   > > By the way, I didn't feel that loaded Venice strings went so
   > well
   > > with the old nylgut, when I heard it on a friend's lute. It may not
   > be
   > > the same with the new nylgut; but the difference in tonal colour
   > > between the coldness of the old nylgut and the warmth of the loaded
   > gut
   > > was just too great. As a minimum, it is necessary (in my opinion)
   to
   > > have gut octaves, with loaded gut basses (Venice Meane octaves with
   > > Venice loaded being my ideal); well perhaps this tonal and visual
   > > colour will be better with New Nylgut, as Ed's report on the
   Baroque
   > > list seems to indicate that it is quite different.
   > > $
   > > Nevertheless, it might be the case that composite Harp string
   basses
   > > compliment well the New Nylgut (both in tonal and visual colour),
   for
   > > those who want to stay with synthetics, and yet who want to rid
   > > themselves of wirewounds. It always struck me that carbon treble
   > > strings were rather unpleasant in sound, and indeed Savarez
   > themselves
   > > say that the thicker the KF string, the more it sounds like gut.
   > > $
   > > Regards
   > > Anthony
   > > ---- Message d'origine ----
   > > >De : [email protected]
   > > >A : [email protected]
   > > >Objet : [LUTE] Re: KF Harp strings and other types
   > > >Date : 12/12/2010 00:30:33 CET
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > The great thing about harp strings is that they come in three
   > colors
   > > -
   > > > natural, black and red.
   > > > You could string your basses all in red harp string so that they
   > look
   > > like
   > > > the renaissance loaded guts ;-)
   > > >
   > > > trj
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > -----Original Message-----
   > > > From: Martyn Hodgson<[email protected]>
   > > > To: Anthony Hind<[email protected]>
   > > > Cc: lute<[email protected]>
   > > > Sent: Sat, Dec 11, 2010 4:18 am
   > > > Subject: [LUTE] Re: KF Harp strings and other types
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > Thank you Anthony,
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > I think when you say 'below 0.95 the strings are composite' you
   > mean
   > > >
   > > > the reverse - below 0.95 means thinner than this.
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > I would only consider using these KF strings for basses and look
   > > >
   > > > forward to Saverez's reply - if they do....
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > regards
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > Martyn
   > > >
   > > > '
   > > >
   > > > --- On Sat, 11/12/10, Anthony Hind<[email protected]> wrote:
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > From: Anthony Hind<[email protected]>
   > > >
   > > > Subject: Re : KF Harp strings and other types
   > > >
   > > > To: "Martyn Hodgson"<[email protected]>
   > > >
   > > > Cc: [email protected]
   > > >
   > > > Date: Saturday, 11 December, 2010, 9:02
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > Dear Martyn
   > > >
   > > > I will send your message to Savarez; but I think it will take
   > > >
   > > > time for them to answer.
   > > >
   > > > Carlos says that below 0.95 the strings are composite, above no.
   > > >
   > > > I have no direct experience with carbon, except as a listener. I
   > Know
   > > >
   > > > Jacob Heringman used KF on his 5th course, and Martin has done so
   > > too,
   > > >
   > > > with some success. I believe that for the fourth course and
   above,
   > > the
   > > >
   > > > density of the monofilament KF is too dense and makes for too
   thin
   > a
   > > >
   > > > string. I know players and lute makers can compensate for this,
   > but
   > > New
   > > >
   > > > Nylgut is surely a better synthetic option.
   > > >
   > > > I believe, below the 5th course the monofilament was too damped,
   > but
   > > >
   > > > perhaps the composite harps strings behave better, and may be
   this
   > > was
   > > >
   > > > what Stephen Gottlieb had tried and found fairly satisfactory.
   > This
   > > >
   > > > could perhaps allow players to avoid wirewounds in situations
   > where
   > > >
   > > > they feel they can't use gut.
   > > >
   > > > I don't think, however, we should pretend that any of these
   > strings
   > > >
   > > > will quite have the warmth and expressivity of gut, even if the
   > > >
   > > > "touche" of a good player may well be far more important than
   > > strings.
   > > >
   > > > I still feel that string choices can make that small expressive
   > > >
   > > > difference.
   > > >
   > > > I do feel that how strings are combined, can almost be as
   > important
   > > as
   > > >
   > > > the strings themselves. I have heard loaded strings combined with
   > the
   > > >
   > > > old nylgut and neither then sounded very good. The old nylgut
   > sounded
   > > >
   > > > too cold, in comparison with the warm loaded strings. Perhaps,
   the
   > > new
   > > >
   > > > nylgut might work better, but I honestly think that as a minimum
   > > loaded
   > > >
   > > > gut should be combined with gut octaves, and that the type of gut
   > > >
   > > > octave chosen is also important.
   > > >
   > > > Sorry to all for having apparently made a break away thread from
   > the
   > > >
   > > > original. I have been having computer problems, and became a
   > little
   > > >
   > > > confused after a number of hours trying to put things right.
   > > >
   > > > Regards
   > > >
   > > > Anthony
   > > >
   > > >
   __________________________________________________________________
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > De : Martyn Hodgson<[email protected]>
   > > >
   > > > A : [email protected]; Anthony Hind<[email protected]>
   > > >
   > > > Cc : [email protected]
   > > >
   > > > Envoye le : Sam 11 decembre 2010, 9h 35min 28s
   > > >
   > > > Objet : Re: KF Harp strings and other types
   > > >
   > > > Dear Anthony,
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > Many thanks for your trouble and, yes, I'd like to take up your
   > kind
   > > >
   > > > offer of asking Saverez (in perfect French!):
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > 1. Are these 'new' strings the same as the old KFG? And does KFN
   > > relate
   > > >
   > > > to the newness (nouveau) of the new strings?
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > 2. Are the strings less than .0.95mm in diameter monofilament and
   > > only
   > > >
   > > > thicker ones composite?
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > 3. What is the density of the composite strings (to allow for
   > > stringing
   > > >
   > > > calculations)? What is the density of the monofilament strings?
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > I'd also like to ask for the modulus if elasticity etc but fear
   > > they'd
   > > >
   > > > freak out!
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > regards
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > Martyn
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > From: Anthony Hind<[email protected]>
   > > >
   > > > Subject: KF Harp strings and other types
   > > >
   > > > To: "Martyn Hodgson"<[email protected]>,
   > > >
   > > > [email protected]
   > > >
   > > > Cc: [email protected]
   > > >
   > > > Date: Friday, 10 December, 2010, 23:52
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > Dear Martyn and Martin
   > > >
   > > > It is true that Carlos' original message was slightly ambiguous,
   > > >
   > > > but I have asked him to clarify this question, and he tells me
   > that
   > > >
   > > > between KFN33 et KFN91 the strings are still simplex
   monofilament,
   > it
   > > >
   > > > is only below the diameter of 0,95mm (KFN95) that strings are
   > > >
   > > > composite. He goes on to say that in his experience the lowest
   > limit
   > > >
   > > > for lutes is KFN140.
   > > >
   > > > Carlos sends you his friendly regards
   > > >
   > > > Best wishes
   > > >
   > > > Anthony
   > > >
   > > > PS If you have more detailed questions, I will try to ask them to
   > > >
   > > > Savarez.
   > > >
   > > > Thank you for this Martin and Anthony. These strings are
   > interesting
   > > as
   > > >
   > > > a further alternative to loaded, wire wound and the 'spring'
   > string;
   > > >
   > > > especially for those with a large number of instruments to
   string.
   > > >
   > > > I looked into these Saverez KF strings some time ago (are you
   sure
   > > >
   > > > they're 'new' out?) and had reports at the time that
   > > >
   > > > they
   > > >
   > > > were simply
   > > >
   > > > PVF(carbon) strings like any other of the same ilk. I'd be
   > grateful
   > > for
   > > >
   > > > any clarification you can
   > > >
   > > > offer.
   > > >
   > > > Martin, you say they only become multi strand above 0.95mm dia
   but
   > in
   > > >
   > > > Anthony's message he gives someone using thinner KF strings with
   > the
   > > >
   > > > implication that they are these new multi-strand type. 'an
   example
   > of
   > > >
   > > > the stringing he uses on a lute or 7c Vihuela : g' KFN33 - d'
   KFN43
   > -
   > > >
   > > > a KFN52 - f KFN66-33 - c KFN84 - 43,5 - G KFN 112 - 57 - F KFN126
   > -
   > > >
   > > > 62.' Is it possible that the 'new' aspect of these KF strings are
   > > that
   > > >
   > > > Saverez now makes these multistrand strings at smaller diameters?
   > > >
   > > > What's the signoficance of the N in KFN? Does it mean new/nouveau
   > > type
   > > >
   > > > of KF strings?
   > > >
   > > > The Saverez website is next to useless only giving marketing
   blurb
   > > and
   > > >
   > > > lists of available sizes but says the strings are made from
   > > 'composite
   > > >
   > > > fibres' which again
   > > >
   > > > implies that all sizes are multi strand. They also
   > > >
   > > > make the claim that they are new but perhaps they simply haven't
   > > >
   > > > updated an
   > > >
   > > > old website?
   > > >
   > > > ALLIANCE KF COMPOSITE, Strings for harp
   > > >
   > > > A real innovation! This strings are manufactured from composites
   > > fibres
   > > >
   > > > A production which requires fine and sophisticated technologies
   > that
   > > >
   > > > only Savarez could implement until now.
   > > >
   > > > Thanks to the technologies, Savarez can produce strings which
   > > >
   > > > geometrical qualities are perfect and which resist to the
   tensions
   > > >
   > > > required by the harp. Many years of work and a focusing of
   > > complicated
   > > >
   > > > technologies were necessary to obtain such a result.
   > > >
   > > > A long work on the molecules, some molecular relationships and
   the
   > > rate
   > > >
   > > > of "cristalinity" allow Savarez to obtain an elongation and an
   > > >
   > > > elasticity identical to the ones of the gut.
   > > >
   > > > The density of these strings is extremely close to the one of the
   > > gut,
   > > >
   > > > so
   > > >
   > > > the comparison takes more value. So though gut strings still are
   > > >
   > > > very popular, Alliance KF strings have a perfect alternative
   sound
   > > >
   > > > for
   > > >
   > > > those who wish to take profit of gut sound and synthetic strings
   > > >
   > > > advantages.
   > > >
   > > > Martyn
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > Dear All,
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > I have been using these KF strings for some years. The smallest
   > > >
   > > > diameter is .95mm, but this is the equivalent of a gut string of
   > > about
   > > >
   > > > 1.07mm. The one I use is "KF95A", but I think the "A" just refers
   > to
   > > >
   > > > the fact that it is a 2m length. It works well as a 5th course on
   > a
   > > >
   > > > renaissance lute (with an octave - I have not tried unison). It
   > looks
   > > >
   > > > more like a gut string, opaque rather than clear. I have not
   tried
   > > the
   > > >
   > > > thicker strings, but it seems that it might be worth a try - I
   > think
   > > >
   > > > Jacob Heringman may have done so. I think the next size down is
   > > .91mm,
   > > >
   > > > but it is a plain monofilament PVF string. I think some people
   are
   > > >
   > > > using them for a unison 5th course.
   > > >
   > > > Best
   > > >
   > > > wishes,
   > > >
   > > > Martin
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > --
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > To get on or off this list see list information at
   > > >
   > > > [1][1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > >
   > > > --
   > > >
   > >
   > > --
   > >
   > > References
   > >
   > > 1. [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
   > >
   >
   >
   >

   --

References

   1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to