My advice has always been that the marks of use are a badge of honour (meaning you've actually done some practice), and trying to clean them off may damage the lute and is futile anyway. I recommend waiting 20+ years, at which point the soundboard will have darkened and the dirty marks are not so obvious.

Think of those poor deluded souls who have their new violins "antiqued" - a wretched commentary on human vanity and foolishness.

Musical instruments are made to be played, not inspected with a magnifying glass.

Best wishes,

Martin

On 24/03/2011 14:23, Anthony Hind wrote:
Dear Martyn
         It seems that many waxes contain some sorts of acids, or acids develop
as


the wax breaks down (beeswax, etc), while Renaissance wax reportedly doesn't.

On the other hand,

"Controversy over its use
Wax coatings are known to be susceptible to accumulations of dust and lint. They



may also obscure some fine detail.
Although Renaissance Wax is generally agreed to be a useful and  stable material

for conservation work, this view is not without some  reservations. Owing to the

polyethylene wax content, some authors have  reported problems in removing it"

This is very relevant for a museum article, where you need to be able to restore

the item to its original state, less so perhaps for a lute."

I have to say that I am more bothered by the marks on my Renaissance lute, yet
if I was a player of note, it would be good that I left a trace.

For example, you can verify that Jakob Lindberg's impressions of his RH
technique correspond perfectly with the clear traces he leaves on his lutes.

If you go to

http://www.musicamano.com/

and click on "instruments" you can observe the the RH little finger traces on
each of JL's instruments do vary progressively according to the period of the
instrument and its size, but not in any strongly marked differentiated way
between Renaissance (near the rose) and Baroque (nearer the bridge).

JL makes this a shift in technique rather than a break (if we judge from the
marks on his lutes); and this is indeed what JL tells ED Durbrow, in a recent
interview.

"ED: More on technique – How do you vary the technique from instrument to
instrument? Do you have different techniques for different instruments, or do
you have one basic technique that you kind of alter?

JL: I suppose perhaps, the latter. In my way of playing, rest stroke with the
thumb is a very central issue to how I play both renaissance and late baroque
lute, of course. And that stroke of falling down with the thumb, giving volume
and strength – That’s one thing. Of course, in later repertoire, to play the
passage work, more and more you rely on m-i, rather than p-i. That, in itself,
opens up the hand slightly differently.

   So, if I play early six-course repertoire, my lute is more horizontal, which
means that thumb inside is more natural. If I play later style, the lute is more

upright, and so, when thumb and forefinger meet, they can meet on the other
side, and in any case, mostly the thumb is out, and the running passages work is

being done by m-i. But it’s a gradual development, and you can see in
iconography as well, how in medieval paintings the lute is at least horizontal.
And you get to the later, and it’s more and more upright. And the whole thing
hangs together. So a ten-course lute style is somewhere in the middle there.
There I use both i-m and p-i. It sort of naturally flows from one to the other.
But in recitals nowadays, I usually don’t  mix two much extreme techniques, so
that I won’t necessarily put half of six-course lute in a Weiss second half."

I will try the oxidized linseed oil.
Regards
Anthony






For




________________________________
De : Martyn Hodgson<[email protected]>
À : Anthony Hind<[email protected]>
Envoyé le : Jeu 24 mars 2011, 14h 48min 48s
Objet : Re: Re : [LUTE] Re: Wax


Not really,

The Stand Oil does not significantly penetrate into the wood (it's much too
thick/viscous to transmit throught the pores) - it acts like a sirface coat
(much as your wax). So it does not change the tone and is nothing like the
treatment of wood that the Old Ones may, or may not, have used.

It's advantage is many centuries of experience and knowledge (used in ancient
Greece), known use for various purposes in early instrument makers workshops and



absolutel inertness and ability to easily recoat (if required).  I wonder about
Renaissance wax using, as it does, distllation products from crude oil and
whether or not it will remain inert over many centuries/decades. There are many
examples of conservation practice once thought cutting edge now utterly
disredited. My advice - if you use anything use stand oil or leave it alone -
the wood will darken in a decade or two.

Incidentally to make Stand Oil simply pour raw linseed oil into a dish and leave



to...... stand. You can occasionaly test it. I reckon a few months will oxidise
is to good thick treacle.

Martyn

--- On Thu, 24/3/11, Anthony Hind<[email protected]>  wrote:


From: Anthony Hind<[email protected]>
Subject: Re : [LUTE] Re: Wax
To: "Martyn Hodgson"<[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, 24 March, 2011, 12:58



Dear Martyn
     I have tried linseed oil with a fixing or drying agent on wood work; but
this is clearly not the same, as it does not have the treacle quality you
mention.

I take it this is more for "varnishing" a completed new lute, rather than to be


added to a lute that has already been polished by the lute maker (French polish


or other).

I imagine the resulting "varnish" would make to table hard and so give
carbon-like properties (greater speed of propogation), rather like treating the


wood with Borax, or other salts.

Regards
Anthony






________________________________
De : Martyn Hodgson<[email protected]>
À : Anthony Hind<[email protected]>
Envoyé le : Jeu 24 mars 2011, 11h 08min 37s
Objet : Re: [LUTE] Re: Wax


Dear Anthony,

Have you tried 'Stand Oil'? - Linseed oil allowed to stand until it starts to
oxidise to the consistency of treacle. It needs to be put on with a rubber since



it's far too viscous to paint on - hence does not pentrate into the wood but
leaves a very thin coat which oxidises hard in a few days. NB NOT modern
commercial so called stand oil which is usually just boiledlinseed oil with
chemical driers.

I believe Stand Oil is what was used originally - certainly an opiled finish was



very common on furniture before the advent of 'French' polishing.

rgds

Martyn

PS Did you eventualy get the pic of the lute player holding his instrument with


tapes?
'
--- On Thu, 24/3/11, Anthony Hind<[email protected]>  wrote:


From: Anthony Hind<[email protected]>
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Wax
To: "Bruno Correia"<[email protected]>, [email protected]
Date: Thursday, 24 March, 2011, 9:44


   Dear Bruno
        Thanks for reminding me, I try to use Renaissance wax fairly
   regularly; it does seem to protect my Baroque lute. I did not treat my
   Renaissance lute at the outset, and it is quite marked by my little
   finger (due to acidity, no doubt).
   Of course the difference might also be due to the difference in
   "varnish" that the two lute makers used; but Stephen Gottlieb was quite
   surprised by the unmarked quality of my Barouqe lute's table; and he
   wondered if it was because I was careful, or if I didn't play all that
   often.
   I thought I might have lost the tin, but I have just found it; but
   there are no details about the formula on the tin. It just  says
   micro-crystaline wax polish, as used by the British museum. I notice
   Miguel Serdoura suggests not only using Renaissance wax, but also
   gently washing the table at the point of contact with weak soapy water.
   I haven't tried that.
   Regards
   Anthony
     __________________________________________________________________

   De : Bruno Correia<[email protected]>
   A : Edward Mast<[email protected]>
   Cc : List LUTELIST<[email protected]>
   Envoye le : Jeu 24 mars 2011, 3h 47min 16s
   Objet : [LUTE] Re: Wax
     Hi Edward,
     Interesting, I'll check the formula, if there is one...
     Just for curiosity, how do you mix these waxes?
     2011/3/23 Edward Mast<[1][1][email protected]>
       Bruno,
       I'm not familiar with this wax.  But Robert Lundberg - in his book
       "Historical Lute Construction" - gives two formulas for a wax to
   use
       on the top.  The simplest one is: 2 parts beeswax, 1 part carnauba
       wax, 6 parts  turpentine.  Perhaps before buying, you can find what
       the formula of the Renaissance wax is.
     On Mar 23, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Bruno Correia wrote:
     >   Is this product (Ranaissance wax) advisable to use on the top of
     the
     >   lute? I think somebody mentioned it in the list...
     >
     >
     >
     >

   [1][2][2]http://www.amazon.com/Picreator-65mL-can-Renaissance-Micro-Cry
   sta
     lli
     >   ne/dp/B001DSZWEM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1300899218&sr=8-1
      >
     >   --
     >
     >  References
     >
     >   1.

   [3][3]http://www.amazon.com/Picreator-65mL-can-Renaissance-Micro-Crysta
   lli
     ne/dp/B001DSZWEM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1300899218&sr=8-1
     >
     >
     >  To get on or off this list see list information at
     >  [4][4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     --
   References
      1. mailto:[5][email protected]
     2.
   [6]http://www.amazon.com/Picreator-65mL-can-Renaissance-Micro-Crystalli
     3.
   [7]http://www.amazon.com/Picreator-65mL-can-Renaissance-Micro-Crystalli
   ne/dp/B001DSZWEM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1300899218&sr=8-1
     4. [8]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1.  mailto:[email protected]
   2. http://www.amazon.com/Picreator-65mL-can-Renaissance-Micro-Crysta
   3. http://www.amazon.com/Picreator-65mL-can-Renaissance-Micro-Crystalli
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
   5. mailto:[email protected]
   6. http://www.amazon.com/Picreator-65mL-can-Renaissance-Micro-Crystalli
   7.
http://www.amazon.com/Picreator-65mL-can-Renaissance-Micro-Crystalline/dp/B001DSZWEM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1300899218&sr=8-1




   8. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html









Reply via email to