Guess what: YouTube send me a 'personal' e-mail (signed by Sander) saying the disputed videos have been found to be all right after all
I take it all back, apparently somebody _is_ listening at the other end of the line. David - escaped Kafka this time On 29 January 2012 22:26, David van Ooijen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29 January 2012 22:18, howard posner <[email protected]> wrote: >> No, but Youtube is likely asking two questions: 1) Is the music in the >> public domain (and if not, do you own the rights to it)? and 2) are you the >> performer (and if not, do you have the rights to the performance)? >> >> Have you told them the music is all centuries old and you are the performer? > > YouTube asks me to prove it's Public Domain. I told them it's 18th > cenury music, come to us in manuscripts and old prints. And I asked > them what kind of prove they want for this. > Is US-law like this: they can ask me to prove I'm innocent? Our > law-system the other way around: innocent until proven guilty, and > 'they' have to prove I'm guilty. > > David > > > >> -- >> >> To get on or off this list see list information at >> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html > > > > -- > ******************************* > David van Ooijen > [email protected] > www.davidvanooijen.nl > ******************************* -- ******************************* David van Ooijen [email protected] www.davidvanooijen.nl *******************************
