Hi,
   very nice list. Let me put them in a slightly different order:
   1. sound (very subjective, but when you hear it, you know you found it)
   2. playability (again very subjective. Most of present lutemakers
   dogmata are rather funny, especially when supported by arguments like
   "this respects the original instrument in the collection ABC". Fine,
   what if that istrument had been built for an 11 years old girl?)
   3. Aesthetic. A lute si suppose to be beautiful. Sometimes it happens
   to see really ugly instruments. With all the research involved in XVI
   and XVII (and XVIII) century lutemaking, an ugly instrument is
   "unauthentic" ;-)
   3. quality of craftmanship (it's sad when you get a nice sound out of a
   lute a bit too toughly built, if you get what I mean...)
   4. authenticity of design / construction (again we need to be very
   careful: there are TWO 6 course lutes survived which tells us not much
   about the variety of 6 course instruments available to XVI century
   players)
   5. materials (I'd dare say that if it's nicely playable and have a good
   sound and looks beautiful, well, materials must have been selected the
   right way...)
   I don't care about the maker's reputation. If it's an investment, OK.
   If it's a music instrument, then the maker is not the first point on my
   list either.
   Very exciting conversation: I look forward to read other opinions :-)
   Thanks!
   Luca
   William Samson on 07/04/12 15.25 wrote:

   I haven't really got much to add to the subject line.  I've been
   chatting with Rob about this and various points have emerged  I'd be
   interested in hearing what priorities you might put on the various
   characteristics of a lute in deciding if it's 'good' or otherwise.

   The kinds of things that have come up are (in no particular order):

     * playability (action, string spacing etc)
     * sound (which I can't easily define)
     * authenticity of design/construction
     * materials used
     * quality of craftsmanship
     * reputation of maker


   Of course these are rather broad headings and might easily be refined,
   clarified or broken down.

   Thoughts, please?

   Bill

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
[1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

References

   1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to