There's another example of a break in the pattern in Marsh.  The
   Bergamask on pp 423-424 - you can see it on my web site at
   [1]http://groundsanddivisions.info/Marsh-Bergamask.pdf
   The change is about 2/3 of the way down the first page and it fits so
   well I think it was intended.  That said, there are some other pieces
   in Marsh that have enough mistakes that they need quite a bit of
   "improvement." One of them is the "Long Dump" page 280.
   Nancy

     I checked the facsimile of the Marsh lute book  and the break in the
     pattern is definitely there -- I tend to agree with the "Maybe it is
     not a mistake" theory. It could be an intentional echo effect - the
     melodic pattern of the second half of the bar is repeated a fourth
     up in the first half of the following bar. It might be intended to
     wake up the audience in a fairly long and repetitive piece and as
     you indicate prepare them for the final recap of the theme. Maybe
     Philip Glass could help here?  It is worth noting that the piece
     appears twice in the book, the first time left obviously unfinished
     with a page and a half left blank immediately following, i.e. enough
     space to finish the transcription later. The scribe however finally
     recopied the piece at the very end of the book from the beginning
     all over again. There are no scratches or corrections of any kind
     in the second version.
     Another interesting aspect of this piece: it is not doleful.
     Alain
     On 6/9/2012 1:04 AM, Ed Durbrow wrote:

     I got a modern printout recently of Philip or Arthur's Dump - from
     Marsh, I believe. About 16 m. before the end there appears to be a
     missing measure or three. That is, the alternating C-G pattern
     breaks and there are two measures based on G.
     I also saw mention on the lute society site catalog of a duet
     version. Is this the same version as Marsh? I thought I had Marsh,
     but I don't, I think I mixed it up with Mynshall.
     I wonder if the 'missing' measure was a mistake and is in Marsh or a
     concordance, or perhaps someone famous has reconstructed it.
     Maybe it is not a mistake? Magnus Andersson certainly plays it
     convincingly:
     [2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVuhbBhYCl0
     If I were the composer, I would have put that two bars of G bit
     right before the 'recap', where he brings back the opening theme at
     the end.
     TIA
     To get on or off this list see list information at
     [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   Nancy Carlin Associates
   P.O. Box 6499
   Concord, CA 94524  USA
   phone 925/686-5800 fax 925/680-2582
   web sites - [4]www.nancycarlinassociates.com
   [5]www.groundsanddivisions.info
   Representing:
   FROM WALES - Crasdant  & Carreg Lafar,  FROM ENGLAND - Jez Lowe & Jez
   Lowe & The Bad Pennies, and now representing EARLY MUSIC - The Venere
   Lute Quartet, The Good Pennyworths & Morrongiello & Young
   Administrator THE LUTE SOCIETY OF AMERICA
   web site - [6]http://LuteSocietyofAmerica.org
   --

References

   1. http://groundsanddivisions.info/Marsh-Bergamask.pdf
   2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVuhbBhYCl0
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   4. http://www.nancycarlinassociates.com/
   5. http://www.groundsanddivisions.info/
   6. http://lutesocietyofamerica.org/

Reply via email to