Never mind.

Mr. Reyerman's samples have answered my questions.

I have decided to order the Kopperud duets, De Visee for archlute, and Croton's 
Rembrance (Shakespeare) songs.

-- R



On Mar 11, 2013, at 2:15 AM, Rockford Mjos wrote:

> I am considering purchasing some music editions, but know only a little about 
> them from the publisher's catalog -- none of my immediate friends own them, 
> and I have never seen them in a library -- and am seeking comments to help me 
> decide whether to invest in them or not.
> 
> I would like comments to be made off-list -- replying only to me and not 
> "reply-all" to the whole list -- to avoid any possibility of negative 
> publicity for these editions.
> 
> Comments might include, for example, an estimation of difficulty, 
> attractiveness of the music, usefulness in public performances, or the 
> fullness of texture. I've added some specific questions below.
> 
> -- Kopperud: The Lute, The Bird, The Deers
> Apparently with 18 duets. Given the modest price of the edition, I'm guessing 
> these may be rather short. Might the music be suitable for one lute 
> accompanying a melody instrument? Is this a "children's" fable interspersed 
> with short, programmatic pieces? Perhaps with text, intended to be spoken? 
> Would the duets stand alone without the text (if any)? Would the pieces 
> appeal to an adult audience? Would a small selection of pieces work for 
> performance? Does anyone know anything about the composer or his writing 
> style? (Melodious? Ultra contemporary and challenging? Minimalist? Light? 
> Touching? As I said, I know nothing of this composer.)
> 
> -- Purcell: 10 Pieces for Archlute (ed. Rubin)
> "Catchy tunes" is mentioned in the catalog. Does that mean light, melodious 
> or might there (hopefully) be something substantial and deeper? (Perhaps I 
> should just roll up my sleeves and do my own!) Rubin is an excellent player, 
> how challenging are his arrangements?
> 
> -- Robert De Visee: 5 Suites for Arciliuto (ed. Romic)
> How is the transcription from the theorbo originals? Is it true that it uses 
> a third course tuned to Bb? (This would be the same as modern guitar tuning.) 
> Could the music be adjusted to comfortably fit in standard Renaissance tuning?
> 29 pieces/5 suites seems like a nice, large selection. Did the editor avoid 
> pieces that might have originally exploited the theorbo's re-entrant tuning 
> -- campanellas, for example -- or might there be pieces that seem too thin?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- Rocky
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



Reply via email to