On 31/10/2013 15:20, Daniel Shoskes wrote:
Most of my videos now “match third party content”. I always dispute and 95% of
the time it is reversed within minutes and the rest of the time it takes a few
days. I suspect it’s all done by bots.
Danny
Many thanks. That is what I would do with music from the past. I would
choose the seventh option to dispute the matter (public domain and not
eligible for copyright protection). But the piece I uploaded is a modern
piece and the composer himself said that OUP had the rights.
I suppose I'll just have to remove it.
Stuart
On Oct 31, 2013, at 11:04 AM, WALSH STUART <[email protected]> wrote:
No doubt it's all my fault - but this is a strange case. I uploaded a video to youtube
yesterday and I got a notification: "Matched third-party content".
That's not the really odd bit though.
The video I uploaded was a modern piece and I've done similar before and in the
description I have written the publication and the date. But yesterday, perhaps
in a senior moment, I also included the publisher, OUP. As it was uploading I
got a notification that it was taking longer than normal. I thought something
was odd
and deleted the reference to OUP - but, perhaps too late. On the other hand it's also
possible that notification of "Matched third-party content" is not connected
at all to my including
OUP in the description.
If I click on "Matched third-party content" I get this screen:
http://www.pluckedturkeys.co.uk/Untitled-1.jpg
So my video 'may include a song owned by a third party' and one or more music
publishing societies may administer the rights. But the really, really odd
thing is that youtube is
very clear at the point in the video in which the 'matched content' starts...15
seconds in... not from the beginning. But I am playing from the very start of
the video and after 15 seconds
I've got to bar 12. So the first 15 bars of Howard Skempton's Prelude 5 from
Images is not 'matched content' but after 15 seconds, for an unspecified amount
of time, it is. I now have two options:
to dispute or acknowledge this. (And I don't know what 'acknowledge' amounts to)
I contacted Howard Skempton, who seems to be a sporting chap and doesn't mind
me having a crack at his pieces on a lute, and told him about this. He strongly
urged me to dispute the matter.
If I choose to dispute it, I get this screen:
http://www.pluckedturkeys.co.uk/Untitled-2.jpg
There are seven options and the first three tell me that they are not valid and
the 'acknowledge' button is inviting me to press it. Howard Skempton tells me
that OUP hold the rights. I
haven't got a licence or permission from OUP (just as hundreds of thousands of
others on youtube who are playing music from books they have - or haven't -
bought).
Fair enough, I reluctantly suppose, OUP are the holders of the rights of the
score and I haven't got specific permission from OUP (even though the actual
composer is fine about it and I played the piece
and took the photo).
But what does 'acknowledge' mean? And what about the first 15 seconds?
Could this possibly be some sort of scam? If I click 'acknowledge' do adverts
start appearing and the minute amount of money start flowing - or trickling -
to some dodgy copyright corporation?
Stuart
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
.
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
