I agree that playing the lute standing up is a real game changer and also that 
modern concert conventions are the thing that stop the game being changed.... 
All the best
Mark
On Mar 18, 2014, at 12:27 AM, Christopher Wilke wrote:

> Sean,
> 
>    You're right - lutes were often supported by a table. This may have even 
> been so in a large ensemble. Strings sat at long tables sitting across from 
> one another rather in a line facing the audience. Lutes may have as well.
> 
>    It is more common in iconography, however, to see the lute/theorbo player 
> standing, using a strap, to the rear of the group. This is really excellent 
> since the sound of the instrument will literally project above the other 
> instruments. In addition to being more easily heard, it is space saving as 
> the neck can project out over the heads of the other players. (Just tell them 
> to be careful when getting up at the end of the show!) It was not unusual for 
> the plucker to read from sheet music on the keyboard, looking over the 
> player's shoulder.
> 
>    The few of times I've stood for a performance, I've received great 
> feedback regarding the projection of the theorbo. In truth, I have actually 
> found it difficult to convince directors to allow me to stand. It apparently 
> breaks some unspoken modern concert convention that only soloists or featured 
> performers may stand (other than those who must do so by necessity, such as 
> bassists or percussionists). 
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> Dr. Christopher Wilke D.M.A.
> Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer
> www.christopherwilke.com
> 
> --------------------------------------------
> On Mon, 3/17/14, Sean Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Ornamental Lutes
> To: "lute" <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, March 17, 2014, 2:22 PM
> 
>    Don't discount,
> too, the usefulness of a table. It
> _does_   help in the
>    forward projection and, moreover, in the
> ringing of the basses.
> 
>    When a string vibrates, the lute absorbs
> that vibration in a contrary
>    motion. No matter how you pluck the string
> it will want to vibrate in
>    whatever direction _it_ wants.
> Naturally,  it will dissipate upwards
>    and downwards where there are no flat
> surfaces/"soundboards" (or
>    audience besides the player).
> 
>    If we eliminate that up-down possibility
> by setting the corner of the
>    lute on a table we will eliminate one axis
> of vibratory dissipation. Of
>    course setting it on the endpin w/ the
> strings pointing straight up
>    won't work but as the strings approach
> horizontal to the ground that
>    up-down vibration axis disappears. The
> lute can only vibrate toward the
>    audience and back. Even for mult-headed
> lutes (read: top heavy), as
>    long as the body is moving only
> forward/backward the effect has to be
>    there.
> 
>    As an experiment I played half a solo
> concert on a table and and the
>    second half off and took note of the
> comments. It was noticable.
>    There's absolutely no reason this couldn't
> be transferable to a
>    continuo theorbo situation.
> 
>    I've heard speculation about what kind of
> table would sound the best
>    but I don't believe that enters
> significantly into the equation though
>    I can't discount it entirely (I'm open to
> doing the experiment again on
>    a solid post vs. a custom-built resonant
> table). It's about eliminating
>    unuseful vibration dissipation and
> redirecting it toward your
>    audience.
> 
>    Sean
> 
>    On Mar 17, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Christopher
> Wilke wrote:
>    Howard,
>    --------------------------------------------
>    On Mon, 3/17/14, howard posner <[1][email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>      You play continuo, dont worry about
> it, and relax knowing
> 
>      there isnt any pressure on you to
> carry the part...
> 
>      About once a year on this list I
> have occasion to remind
> 
>      someone that playing continuo isnt
> like playing a lute
> 
>      concerto.  It isnt necessarily
> about being heard as
> 
>      a distinct, identifiable
> sound.  Youre part of the
> 
>      mix.
> 
>      ...it doesnt matter at all what you
> play, just do your best, enjoy
>      the show and
> 
>      chalk it up to practice time.
> 
>    Just like closing your eyes, clicking your
> heels together and
>    repeating, "there's no place like home...
> there's no place like home...
>    " won't magically transport you someplace
> warm and safe, repeatedly
>    offering the same conjecture about the
> lute's role in an ensemble won't
>    make it true. There is no historical
> evidence implying that plucked
>    continuo players didn't want or expect to
> be heard even in large
>    groups.
>    On the contrary, Weiss writes, "I have
> adapted one of my instruments
>    for accompaniment in the orchestra and
> church. It has the size, length,
>    power and resonance of the veritable
> theorbo and has the same effect,
>    only the tuning is different... [The
> archlute and theorbo] are
>    ordinarily played with the nails and
> produce in close proximity a
>    coarse, harsh sound." Period performers
> didn't select powerful,
>    resonant instruments which they then
> played with nails, producing an
>    intentionally penetrating tone color, only
> to become a subordinate
>    "part of the mix."  Certainly they
> were "heard as a distinct,
>    identifiable sound." Something is deeply
> flawed with an ideology that
>    allows one to actually feel comfortable
> writing, "it doesn't matter at
>    all what you play... chalk it up to
> practice time" in a serious musical
>    discussion.
>    Personally, I think the "composite sound"
> line of reasoning is just a
>    cop-out for players unwilling to explore
> the resources of the
>    instrument beyond the tender touch that
> sounds so dreamily ethereal and
>    wistfully antiquated when practicing alone
> in the still privacy of a
>    small room. If, however, one plays close
> to the bridge - as written and
>    iconographic sources very explicitly
> demonstrate - the tone will
>    project. This takes some work, as it's not
> simply a matter of clawing
>    at the strings forcefully. With practice,
> it is possible to create a
>    tone that is both robust and distinct even
> in large ensembles.
>    Chris
>    --
>    To get on or off this list see list
> information at
>    [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 
>    --
> 
> References
> 
>    1. mailto:[email protected]
>    2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



Reply via email to