I'm old (in my 70's) & I no longer play, but a long time ago I got my
   friend Robert Lundberg (who died of cancer in 2001) to build me a
   theorbo which he did & it was strung with double strings, but I very
   early on I put only single strings on it--to those who speak as Luca
   Manassero does of the historical basis of   instruments I retort back
   the many many theorbos with single strings--superbly played--this means
   very little in the gross (in)significance of things. Oh it's something
   to argue about, granted, while many superb players do what they
   do...superbly well...
   Timothy Swain

   On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Martyn Hodgson
   <[1][email protected]> wrote:

        Dear Luca,
        You're generally right: leaving aside 'French' large theorbos and
        modern fashionable affectations, very few extant large
     instruments (ie
        those actually requiring a double re-entrant arrangement) have
     other
        than the usual configuration of 6 stopped courses (more often
     double)
        with 8 single basses. Nevertheless, there is indeed some
     iconographic
        and other evidence to suggest that seven fingered courses were
        occasionally found (eg Mace for the 'English theorbo - though
     Talbot
        only notes six fingered courses in his reports) and other rare
     examples
        include Puget's famous (French) 1687 painting showing one single
     and
        six double fingered courses (with octave strung doubled long
     basses!).
        The Schelle of 1728 has a bridge (original I think) for seven
     courses
        (all double except for the first) and seven single basses -
     however the
        lower peghead has fourteen pegholes and the upper has eight! It's
        possible that the relatively shortish fingered string length
     (85cm) of
        this large theorbo allowed for the Weiss/Baron Dm 'German'
     theorbo
        tuning (ie first course at non-rentrant nominal d' at low pitch)
     - if
        so, hardly a typical theorbo.
        Other than Campion's suggested arrangement (was it ever actually
        employed?), perhaps the closest to the 8 fingered course
     instrument you
        mention as being increasingly used by some these days, is
     Praetorius'
        (1619) Paduanische Theorbo which he shows with eight fingered and
     eight
        basses. None of these are now known and I can see no trace of
     other
        early evidence for them (note the very short open basses on P's
        engraving - one feature certainly not copied these days.....)
        Finally, as I'm sure you'll know, many early theorbo
     intabulations show
        octave jumps where chromatic semitones are found in the bass
     (most
        common is the fingered F or F# on the fifth course and the same
     an
        octave lower on the eighth course) - so clearly numerous 'Old
     Ones'
        faced the same issue and didn't respond by adding one or two
     fingered
        course in the bass.
        regards,
        Martyn
        PS. Having said all the above let me express a mea culpa - like
     you
        (and, I find, so many others) I also have a seventh fingered
     course for
        the very useful low G#   on my large (93cm) single strung
     theorbo.
        However, for my largeish (89cm) double strung fingered course
        instrument, the seventh (single) course is on the long peghead.
     This
        seems to work well: I think because a double strung fifth course
     gives
        an added depth and bite to the f (or f#).   MH

     __________________________________________________________________
        From: Luca Manassero <[2][email protected]>
        To: Lute List <[3][email protected]>
        Sent: Wednesday, 19 August 2015, 8:59
        Subject: [LUTE] Theorboes and their stringing

        Dear List,
        I really do not mean to start some sort of "war", but I noticed
   that
        more and more theorboes in YouTube   videos and/or pictures (and
        concerts...)   are built with eight single strings + six basses.
        While I certainly understand that an f# can happen (at least to
   us)
        apparently   out of nowhere, I do not know of   any historically
        surviving theorbo with that configuration.
        To get even worse, I am not sure to be aware   of surviving
      instruments
        in a 7 single courses   + 7 basses setup, are you? (I play a 7 +
   7,
        anyway)
        Talking about the Chitarrone / XVII c. Theorbo (therefore keeping
      aside
        the French theorbo or the "thA(c)orbe A   la Maltot" with 8
   courses +
      6
        basses,   as mentioned by FranAS:ois Campion in 1716 / 1730) I
   know
      the
        iconographical evidence for 6 single courses or 6 double courses,
   but
        honestly I couldn't find ANY painting showing a seven single
   courses
        theorbo like mine, not to mention an eight single courses
   instrument.
        Any hint, suggestion   and/or   direction to follow?
        Thank you in advance,
        Luca
        --
      To get on or off this list see list information at

        [1][4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
        --
     References
        1. [5]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. mailto:[email protected]
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   5. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to