Huh? Folks, sound and vibration are one and the same. If the string can
   be seen to be vibrating and you can't hear it, it is either a problem
   with your hearing (which to be sure comes naturally with our advancing
   age), or there is sufficient ambient noise in the room or other notes
   being played that the sound is overwhelmed. You can be sure, that if
   the string is vibrating, there IS sound, whether your ears/brain sense
   it or not. The attenuation of the vibration follows a mathematical
   formula (exponential decay) that is related to internal damping and
   parasitic loss (which is energy transferred from the string to the body
   of the instrument). Attempting to ascribe a single time duration number
   to the sustain is an absurdity that violates the laws of physics. You
   can use a single number to approach some convenient threshold, say for
   example 75% attenuation (time to 75% reduction in volume), but 100%
   attenuation is something you would never be able to determine with any
   useful accuracy. Rob's video shows that it seems relatively easy to
   ‘qualitatively' assess the difference in sustain, but to put numbers on
   it, you would need to decide on some terminating threshold, and realize
   that the string is still vibrating and there is still sound beyond that
   terminating threshold.


   A. John Mardinly, Ph.D., P.E.
   Retired Principal Materials Nanoanalysis Engineer
   EMail: [1][email protected]
   Cell: [2]408-921-3253 (does not work in TEM labs)
   But don't call the lab….I won't be there!

   On Jan 9, 2017, at 3:42 AM, Jean-Marie Poirier
   <[3][email protected]> wrote:

   Not sure about that Mimmo... Mersenne is a scientist, therefore a
   precise observer and his observations are worth considering seriously.
   When he describes the duration of the sound of the bass stings of a
   lute, he takes care to precise ""...le son des grosses chordes de Luth
   est apperceu de l'oreille durant la sixiesme partie, ou le tiers d'une
   minute...", the sound is preceived by the ear for 10 to 20 seconds. And
   a few lines further he says : "...Il n'y a nul doute que la chorde se
   meut encore long-temps après que l'oreille en perd le son..." = there
   is no doubt that the strings still moves a long time after the ear has
   lost its sound. So he is not confusing vibration and sound, not at all
   !
   Now, as Matthew remarked, we don't know about the conditions in which
   the test was done. If the lute is laid on a table, it might certainly
   influence the parameters of the experience...
   Best,
   Jean-Marie
   --------------

     I am lucky: I have  seen /installed strings on some hundreds od
     lutes in
     these last years.  Maybe I can be in mistake, but  I have never seen
     a lute,
     whose basses are roped strings or even loaded roped strings, whose
     sustain
     is so long. Even with modern Pyramid nylon wound strings (they have
     in
     absolute the higher density) .
     I would like to know if here there is somebody that can have a
     positive
     experience in matter.  At present I would stick that Mersenne  meant
      how
     many time last  the vibration, not the sound.
     Mimmo
     -----Messaggio originale-----
     From: Matthew Daillie
     Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 10:52 AM
     To: Mimmo Peruffo
     Cc: Rob MacKillop ; Lute List
     Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Aquila Loaded Nylgut sustain
     One thing nobody seems to have mentioned is the vast differences in
     sustain
     from one instrument to another. Maybe Mersenne's comments go to show
     just
     how good some lutes were at the time. If one was to rest a lute on
     the edge
     of a wooden table as they were wont to do at the time, then maybe
     those 20
     seconds are not so unrealistic.
     Best,
     Matthew=
     To get on or off this list see list information at
     [4]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmo
     uth.edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html&d=DQIFaQ&c=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGq
     yv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU&r=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-L
     NEQ&mgCpPX7-QTOHbYqWuSyUTqerOFWHvwnWGtFZST9GXg8&s=V1-Mescs6gIDjdVHOl
     SP8VEmKgpA4u4e_0PqiwTxEdo&e=

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. tel:408-921-3253
   3. mailto:[email protected]
   4. 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmouth.edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html&d=DQIFaQ&c=AGbYxfJbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A-1IxfAU&r=MAuGvnWTcVQkxORgQD0QS50ZicPM3Nw-61ygSK-LNEQ&mgCpPX7-QTOHbYqWuSyUTqerOFWHvwnWGtFZST9GXg8&s=V1-Mescs6gIDjdVHOlSP8VEmKgpA4u4e_0PqiwTxEdo&e=

Reply via email to