:-D! Good choice Bruno!
Jean-Marie

> Le 2 févr. 2018 à 13:26, fournierbru <fournier...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
>   the Montreal community will be able to get stoned legalllly as of july
>   1st...personally at 59..I am no longer interested..prefer playing
>   Ballard and Gaultier
> 
>   Bruno
> 
>   Envoyé de mon appareil Samsung de Bell via le réseau le plus vaste au
>   pays.
> 
>   -------- Message d'origine --------
>   De : Dan Winheld <dwinh...@lmi.net>
>   Date : 18-02-01 8:44 PM (GMT-05:00)
>   À : Susan Sandman <susan.sand...@gmail.com>, Tristan von Neumann
>   <tristanvonneum...@gmx.de>
>   Cc : lutelist Net <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>   Objet : [LUTE] Re: Cherbury lute book
> 
>   They are legalizing Marijuana all over the place, come to California if
>   you want to get stoned! (I gave up that little distraction decades ago,
>   but I also much prefer Ballard). :-D
>   Dan
>>   On 2/1/2018 5:15 PM, Susan Sandman wrote:
>>    Stoning is medieval, appropriate only hundreds of years before...
>>    Susan
>>    On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 6:46 PM Tristan von Neumann
>>    <[1]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> 
>>      Do I get stoned by the community if I say that I like Ballard
>   more
>>      anyway? :)
>>>      Am 02.02.2018 um 00:36 schrieb Jean-Marie Poirier:
>>> En guise de conclusion ;-) :
>>> If you look at the chronological development of Ennemond's
>   career
>>      and life, his "his high reputation" as a baroque lute super
>   hero
>>      simply doesn't hold.
>>> So there must be other material around to explain this
>   phenomenon.
>>> Cherbury is only one piece in the puzzle and certainly not
>   the
>>      most interesting one concerning old Ennemond! There is a lot
>   more to
>>      see and play in at least a dozen other ms. and of course his
>>      production in accords nouveaux is another essential aspect of
>   the
>>      problem.
>>> 
>>> Merci de votre intérêt et la "chasse" continue... :-)!
>>> Best,
>>> Jean-Marie
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Le 1 févr. 2018 à 22:53, G. C. <[2]kalei...@gmail.com>
>   a écrit
>>      :
>>>> 
>>>>    PS.
>>>>    And of course, I meant to say "you and Jean-Marie"
>   SORRY! :D
>>>>    On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:27 PM, G. C.
>>      <[1][3]kalei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>         Great that you feel that way, Ron. I'm just saying,
>   that
>>>>      comparing to
>>>>         what there is of real quality music for the lute
>   out
>>      there, and
>>>>      trying
>>>>         to keep in mind, the "high reputation" of Ennemond
>>      Gaultier, I'm
>>>>      sadly,
>>>>         not at all impressed by these alleged simple
>   courantes
>>      and voltas
>>>>      in
>>>>         Cherbury.     Whatever his fame might otherwise be,
>>      these little
>>>>      pieces
>>>>         just don't cut the mustard IMHO.
>>>>         But if you, as a renowned player, recognise
>   Ennemond's
>>      style in
>>>>      those
>>>>         little ditties, I'm definitely not going to argue.
>   :)
>>>>         Best
>>>>         G
>>>>         On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:09 PM, Ron Andrico
>>>>      <[1][2][4]praelu...@hotmail.com>
>>>>         wrote:
>>>>              G, I think you may have misunderstood my
>   message.
>>        I was
>>>>      not
>>>>           saying
>>>>              there were concordances in the CNRS edition of
>>      Vieux
>>>>      Gaultier
>>>>           that
>>>>              definitely linked pieces in Herbert to the
>   proper
>>      Gaultier.
>>>>         I
>>>>           said
>>>>              that one could easily identify the style of
>   music
>>      in that
>>>>      edition
>>>>           and
>>>>              compare to the sparse style of the Herbert
>   pieces
>>      attributed
>>>>      to
>>>>              Gaultier.     From a player's point of view, I
>   feel
>>      a very
>>>>      strong
>>>>              similarity, and one only has to supply
>   ornamented
>>      repeats in
>>>>      the
>>>>           proper
>>>>              style to flesh out the bones of these pieces
>   and
>>      make some
>>>>      very
>>>>           fine
>>>>              music.
>>>>              RA
>>>>         --
>>>>      References
>>>>         1. mailto:[3][5]praelu...@hotmail.com
>>>>      To get on or off this list see list information at
>>>> 
>>      [4][6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>>> 
>>>>    --
>>>> 
>>>> References
>>>> 
>>>>    1. mailto:[7]kalei...@gmail.com
>>>>    2. mailto:[8]praelu...@hotmail.com
>>>>    3. mailto:[9]praelu...@hotmail.com
>>>>    4.
>   [10]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>>    --
>> 
>> References
>> 
>>    1. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
>>    2. mailto:kalei...@gmail.com
>>    3. mailto:kalei...@gmail.com
>>    4. mailto:praelu...@hotmail.com
>>    5. mailto:praelu...@hotmail.com
>>    6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>    7. mailto:kalei...@gmail.com
>>    8. mailto:praelu...@hotmail.com
>>    9. mailto:praelu...@hotmail.com
>>   10. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>> 
>> 
> 



Reply via email to