Dear Lex,
   Further to the below, I've now looked at the paper by Rebours. Much of
   it consists of simple assertion by a variety of modern guitar players
   giving their own personal preferences with the occasional early source
   mentioned.  So not exactly overwhelming evidence for the historical
   practice - either way.......
   So you know: my own practice on the period guitar is to have the RH
   nails just so long as to provide support to the 'nibble' end of the
   plucking finger.
   regards
   M.

   ----- Forwarded message -----
   From: Martyn Hodgson <[email protected]>
   To: 'Lute List' <[email protected]>; Lex Eisenhardt
   <[email protected]>
   Sent: Friday, 10 May 2019, 09:09:24 BST
   Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: De Visee
   Dear Lex,
   Well...., are you referring to the  report that said C couldn't play
   because he'd broken a nail?
   This might, of course, easily as well refer to a left hand nail which
   was broken (torn) down to the quick (ouch!) thus making playing
   impossible (too, too painful) or, indeed, the same thing on the right
   hand.
   Or is there some other report of which I'm unaware?
   regards
   M
   On Thursday, 9 May 2019, 13:53:01 BST, Lex Eisenhardt
   <[email protected]> wrote:
   On the other side [of the nail], we know that Corbetta used them. The
   influence of his playing, on a whole generation of guitarists (perhaps
   also including Robert de Visee), can hardly be overestimated.
   Therefore, it seems likely that, also in France, some used their nails
   when playing from the books available. And Visee may have been well
   aware of that.
   There is an another interesting on-line article on the nail subject,
   written by Gerard Rebours:
   [1]Avec ou sans ongles ? (articlede G. Rebours)

Avec ou sans ongles ? (articlede G. Rebours)

   Article de G. Rebours sur le pour et le contre du jeu avec onglesà la
   guitare et au luth

Avec ou sans ongles ? (articlede G. Rebours)

   Article de G. Rebours sur le pour et le contre du jeu avec onglesà la
   guitare et au luth
   Lex
   -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
   Van: [2][email protected] [mailto:[3][email protected]]
   Namens Martyn Hodgson
   Verzonden: donderdag 9 mei 2019 08:49
   Aan: [4][email protected]; Lute List <[5][email protected]>
   Onderwerp: [LUTE] Re: De Visee
     That's not the point being made. Which is that, even if some theorbo
     players employed nails (or didn't), we  cannot draw the unequivocal
     conclusion that the period guitar was therefore also played with
   nails.
     And, in particular, that this was the practice that De Visee
   generally
     expected and followed himself
     Richard Sweeney, who uses nails, gives a reasonably even-handed
   account
     from some early sources in his blog available by pasting this into
   your
     search.
     [6]https://richardsweeney.com/the-best-way-of-play/
     MH
     On Wednesday, 8 May 2019, 14:35:21 BST, magnus andersson
     <[7][email protected]> wrote:
     Do we have any evidence of any historical guitar or theorbo player
   who
     explicitly played without fingernails?
     Den onsdag, maj 8, 2019, 3:20 em, skrev Martyn Hodgson
     <[8][email protected]>:
       Hear! hear!.
       And just because some theorbo players used nails by no means that
   De
       Visee did. This is, of course, how modern myths
   start................
       Martyn
       On Wednesday, 8 May 2019, 11:09:58 BST, Monica Hall
       <[1][9][email protected]> wrote:
       Corbetta didn't have to pay his musicians out of his own pocket -
       that's just another myth. The relevant source states that
       Every foreign musician who performed at court in Turin was given
   500
       Thlr. and Madame Royale wished to show her generosity by not
       withholding anything [from Signor Corbetta].
       Madame Royale was the mother of Victor Amadeus, the ruler of Savoy
   at
       the time when Corbetta visited the town to perform.
       We don't actually know whether De Visee played with his nails.
       Monica
       > On 07 May 2019 at 22:20 magnus andersson
       <[1][2][10][email protected]> wrote:
       >
       >
       >    Dear collective wisdom,
       >    From what I have understood, it seems like manicure has been
       around
       >    since  at least 3200 BC, so I assume players like Piccinini,
       Corbetta
       >    (who we know had
       >    to cancel one of his concerts due to a broken nail- and still
     pay
       his
       >    fellow musicians from his own pocket!) and perhaps de VisÃÆ Ã
   ©e
     had
       found
       >    a way for them to get it to work without shredding and tearing
       their
       >    strings apart constantly, and - to quote Piccinini:
       >
       >    "the one, and very important [thing] is to play neatly, and
       cleanly; In
       >    the manner that all small touches of the string may be
   schietto,
       like
       >    pearl[s]"
       >    /Magnus
       >
     --
   References
     1. mailto:[11][email protected]
     2. mailto:[12][email protected]
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [13]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   Visible links:
   1. http://g.rebours.free.fr/6E/6.With_or_without_nails.html
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. mailto:[email protected]
   4. mailto:[email protected]
   5. mailto:[email protected]
   6. https://richardsweeney.com/the-best-way-of-play/
   7. mailto:[email protected]
   8. mailto:[email protected]
   9. mailto:[email protected]
  10. mailto:[email protected]
  11. mailto:[email protected]
  12. mailto:[email protected]
  13. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   Hidden links:
  15. http://g.rebours.free.fr/6E/6.With_or_without_nails.html
  16. http://g.rebours.free.fr/6E/6.With_or_without_nails.html

Reply via email to