Yes, Howard, I am very good at distilling complex ideas into concise
   terms, and I am tempted to stop at saying thanks for your laudatory
   statement, barbs and all.  But we dwell in an age that places far too
   much value on the shaping of public perceptions through subtle language
   via platforms such as ours, and it will not do to let your accusations
   stand without remarks.
   We all approach music from a different perspective and I value the
   insights and the musical skills of many performers who are and have
   been on the public stage for many years.  What I do not value is the
   manner in which various players claim authority by stating that their
   particular approach is the one true way.  And I do not value the manner
   in which a large helping of attitude has been foisted on the public by
   mavens of marketing in the pursuit of greater notoriety, and thus
   sales.
   As lutenists, players of ancient instruments that became outmoded for
   very good reasons, we do the historical research and eventually come to
   understand how the machine evolved and how it works best for each of us
   today as applied to our chosen repertory.  Martyn H pointed out, as I
   have in the past, that all this noise about temperaments really has to
   do with making keyboard instruments sound less bad in the pursuit of
   music that contains more intervallic spice as time and taste marched
   on.  There survive some historical discussions of lute fretting but the
   language is unclear or otherwise flawed.  A sideways application of
   modern interpretations of keyboard temperaments to the lute and fretted
   viol is a bit of an awkward stretch.
   As for the lute, the frets move.  Move them until the music sounds
   right.
   RA
     __________________________________________________________________

   From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu <lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu> on behalf
   of howard posner <howardpos...@ca.rr.com>
   Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 2:01 AM
   To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Lute Temperaments

   > On Jul 20, 2019, at 4:22 AM, Ron Andrico <praelu...@hotmail.com>
   wrote:
   >
   >  musicians who
   >   understand music and who explore the more interesting repertory for
   >   lute follow the precepts of Galilei, which approximates equal
   >   temperament.
   You just trashed most of the best musicians in early music, and,
   apparently, most of the best music, in a single sentence.  As a person
   who writes for a living, I can only admire your efficiency with words.
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   Virus-free. [2]www.avast.com

   --

References

   Visible links:
   1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   2. 
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link

   Hidden links:
   4. 
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon
   5. 
file://localhost/net/ifs-users/lute-arc/L25094-236TMP.html#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2

Reply via email to