Maybe difficulty could be a criterion. Put the difficult ones first so that you are more likely to practice them.
Miles > On Aug 9, 2019, at 8:36 PM, Tristan von Neumann <tristanvonneum...@gmx.de> > wrote: > > Haha :) > > Nice one, but I already have a hard time choosing the pieces. > > There are just so many good ones. :) > > So all pieces finally ending up in the book are "5/5 stars" or "perfect > 10s". > > > > On 10.08.19 02:34, Miles Dempster wrote: >> How about ordering in ascending/descending order of your ‘favouriteness’ ;-) >> >> Miles >> >> >> >> >>> On Aug 9, 2019, at 7:28 PM, Tristan von Neumann <tristanvonneum...@gmx.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Here's a "problem" to which any ideas are welcome: >>> >>> >>> I'm preparing a lute book for myself that shall contain all my favourite >>> pieces, about 500 pages. >>> >>> I am still struggling with the order the pieces. >>> >>> Apart from solvable problems like page turns of pieces with more than 2 >>> pages, I am not sure what concept is the best. >>> >>> There's plenty of possibilities: >>> >>> * by date of sources - useful for experiencing history, offers a nice >>> mixture of genres within >>> >>> * in alphabetical order of the composer (though this would make A as in >>> anonymous the biggest part...) >>> >>> * by country of origin >>> >>> * by genre (as in historical prints - Fantasies, Chansons and Madrigals, >>> Motets, Dances) >>> >>> * a mixture of those above >>> >>> >>> Any experiences/suggestions are welcome. >>> >>> >>> :) >>> T* >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> To get on or off this list see list information at >>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html >> >> >> > >
