Well, I just went back to Martin's interesting discussion on the use of
Octaves around the 1590s and he gives good arguments for their use in
John Johnson, Francis Cutting and Anthony Holborne, so perhaps I should
attempt to move to Bass and octave on C5 whatever the difficulty.
Regards
Anthony
[1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
Le vendredi, novembre 29, 2019, 10:42 AM, Anthony Hind
<agno3ph...@mail.cs.dartmouth.edu> a écrit :
Just another thought, I think I originally chose Unissons on 5C
because
I thought I might be playing more latish English renaissance pieces,
Dowland, Holborne etc. I note most speakers here seem to prefer 5C
with
octaves whatever the music? I seem to remember Martin Shepherd
discussing this issue on his site.
Regards
Anthony
[1]Envoyà © depuis Yahoo Mail pour iPhone
Le jeudi, novembre 28, 2019, 2:56 PM, Bruno Cognyl-Fournier
<[2]fournier...@gmail.com> a à ©crit :
Love 5th and 6th in octaves...only play that way.
Le sam. 23 nov. 2019 5 h 10 p.m., Edward Martin
<[1][2][3]edvihuel...@gmail.com> a à ©crit :
I think you will be surprised at how you will like the 5 th
course in
octaves. Good luck!
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 23, 2019, at 12:34 PM, Jurgen Frenz
<[2][3][4]eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com> wrote:
à ¯ » ¿
Hello Edward,
thank you very much, I feel encouraged now to "go octaves"
all
the way
down from 5th. course.I should consider myself stupid that I
hesitated,
because who is there to judge me apart from myself. I am not
competing
in any academic exercise :-)
Thank you very much again, gut is cost-wise prohibitive to
me.
Best regards
Jurgen
----------------------------------
"Close your eyes. Fall in love. Stay there."
JalÃl ad-Dà «n Muhammad Rumi
à ¢à ¢à ¢à ¢à ¢à ¢à ¢ Original Message à ¢à ¢Ã
¢à ¢à ¢à ¢à ¢
On Saturday, November 23, 2019 9:16 PM, Edward Martin
<[3][4][5]edvihuel...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Jurgen,
I agree that in with 8-course lutes, they do tend to not
sound
as
brilliant as with octaves. Of course, it is a compromise,
but
on my
8-course lute, I have octaves on 5,6,7, & 8 and like it very
much.
Whatever brand of strings you try, I think you will like the
5th
course
in octaves, as it brightens up the sound. I do not see it as
confusing
the voices as you say, but adding to the richness and
complexity
of the
sound. Another thing that could very much improve the sound
is
to use
gut. If you do not want gut, at least consider using gut for
octaves.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 6:19 AM Jurgen Frenz
<[1][4][5][6]eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com> wrote:
Hello there,
I have an 8c lute now since 10 months and from the
beginning
I'm
"unhappy" with the sound of the unison C strings on it. I
changed
the
plain Aquila strings to round-wound Aquilas but to me it
sounds
quite
the same. What I'm missing is the high frequencies that we
have on
6c
instruments with the octave string. In my mind I call the
current
sound
"plastic-y". The maker of the instrument suggested to try
out
the
Savarez early music strings but I do not think I would
recover
high
frequencies with them.
Any remedies that you have tried out with success other
than
"just
get
used to it"? An octave string shouldn't be a good idea
because
it
would
confuse voices.
Hoping for some suggestions,
Jurgen
----------------------------------
"Close your eyes. Fall in love. Stay there."
JalÃl ad-Dà à ¯ ¿ ½n Muhammad Rumi
To get on or off this list see list information at
[2][5][6][7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
References
1. mailto:[6][7][8]eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
2.
[7][8][9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
References
1. mailto:[9][10]edvihuel...@gmail.com
2. mailto:[10][11]eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
3. mailto:[11][12]edvihuel...@gmail.com
4. mailto:[12][13]eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
5. [13][14]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
6. mailto:[14][15]eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
7. [15][16]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
References
1. [17]https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/?.src=iOS
2. mailto:[18]edvihuel...@gmail.com
3. mailto:[19]eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
4. mailto:[20]edvihuel...@gmail.com
5. mailto:[21]eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
6. [22]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
7. mailto:[23]eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
8. [24]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
9. mailto:[25]edvihuel...@gmail.com
10. mailto:[26]eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
11. mailto:[27]edvihuel...@gmail.com
12. mailto:[28]eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
13. [29]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
14. mailto:[30]eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
15. [31]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
References
1. https://yho.com/footer0
2. mailto:fournier...@gmail.com
3. mailto:edvihuel...@gmail.com
4. mailto:eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
5. mailto:edvihuel...@gmail.com
6. mailto:eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
8. mailto:eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
10. mailto:edvihuel...@gmail.com
11. mailto:eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
12. mailto:edvihuel...@gmail.com
13. mailto:eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
14. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
15. mailto:eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
16. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
17. https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/?.src=iOS
18. mailto:edvihuel...@gmail.com
19. mailto:eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
20. mailto:edvihuel...@gmail.com
21. mailto:eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
22. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
23. mailto:eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
24. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
25. mailto:edvihuel...@gmail.com
26. mailto:eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
27. mailto:edvihuel...@gmail.com
28. mailto:eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
29. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
30. mailto:eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
31. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
