On 14/12/12 08:40, Rohan McLeod wrote:
> "Re: Latest generation laptops with Windows 8 preinstalled, EFI mess..";
> the idea occurred that MS might eventually replace or augment Windows;
> by building it as a GUI plus  a Unix / Linux kernel, in the way Apple,
> now builds the Mac OS as a GUI plus a highly configured  FreeBSD kernel 
> (or whatever);

To a degree, Windows is already quite minimal and modular. For example,
every recent version of Windows has a small ~165 MB bootable image
located in C:\Recovery (.wim files are used for ramdisk images) that is
a bootable Windows PE environment containing a fairly complete set of
command line tools, as well as enough GUI tools to recover a broken
Windows system.

This base environment is also enough to run most Windows software (look
at tools such as PEBuilder, which is able to produce a bootable .iso
containing a WinPE image, plus software you want installed).

Though Windows is by no stretch POSIX compliant, most would argue that
is not necessary attribute anyway, given the huge breadth of server
applications chugging away happily on Windows boxes. (You and I would
disagree on that, but this *is* a Linux mailing list. Meanwhile, the
rest of the world keeps on spinning.)

Deployment is also modular -- "Dism" is a recent package management
system for adding/removing Windows components. [0][1] And of course,
Windows Installer can be fully automated/managed too. Used wisely, these
two tools can be just as powerful as any Linux package manager.

Basically what I’m saying is that changing to a model with a minimal
Linux/Unix base wouldn’t gain anything, because they already have a
minimal modular system to that does everything that Microsoft needs it to.

--
[0] http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh824821.aspx
[1] Oh, Dism can also manipulate .wim and .vhd (VM image) files
directly. Sort of like chroot package management without actually
needing chroot.
_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to