On 08/01/13 16:23, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 8/01/2013 11:12 AM, Chris Samuel wrote:
>> As a counterpoint, here are Marc Merlins experiences with poor
>> ramdom I/O performance with a Samsung SSD (and its replacement),
>> early death of Crucial SSDs and good experience s with OCZ Vertex 4.
>>
>> http://marc.merlins.org/perso/linux/post_2012-08-15_The-tale-of-SSDs_-Crucial-C300-early-Death_-Samsung-830-extreme-random-IO-slowness_-and-settling-with-OCZ-Vertex-4.html
>
> That sure goes against the flow....
>
> I would have rated like this:
>
>     1. IBM
>
>     2. Samsung (probably 1 & 2 interchangeable)
>
>     3. Crucial -- only because they don't have an AU local presence that
> I know about.


I've heard the Intel drives are pretty good; surprised you're not 
mentioning them at all. I've never heard of the IBM ones!

_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to