Aryan Ameri <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks to everyone for their very helpful advice, especially Craig, > Mike and Trent. I've done a few test runs on a few small > subdirectories, and the bottleneck seems to be the USB 2.0 interface > of my computer, with plenty of RAM, CPU and network capacity to spare.
USB 2 is notoriously slow in this scenario. For details, look up Sarah Sharp's talk at LCA several years ago on USB 3, which solves the problems. As I recall, it isn't the actual data transfer rate that causes the poor performance, but I can't remember the details now. _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
