On 30 November 2013 08:53, Chris Samuel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 05:08:58 PM Tim Connors wrote: > >> I wonder about worker vs prefork? linux processes are lightweight, so I >> don't imagine threading is going to be much better. We only fork one >> process per second typically, and I don't think there'll be many >> differences in context switch overhead between the two. Worker apparently >> "sucks for php", but I don't know whether that's for mod_php or cgi or >> whatever. > > Well I switched from prefork to worker on my personal Debian VM so that it > could cope with lots of PHP, I kept running out of RAM otherwise. > > Worked really well and my problems went away. > > Now of course it's not loaded anything like the BoM servers, but this is the > first I've heard that it "sucks for php".
It's even in the PHP manual: http://www.php.net/manual/en/faq.installation.php#faq.installation.apache2 _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
