Toby Corkindale wrote:
> On 20 May 2014 12:02, Rohan McLeod <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Chris Samuel wrote:
>>> On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:36:08 AM Trent W. Buck wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is it still true that Intel SSDs are special and present completely
>>>> different performance characteristics to all other SSDs?
>>> This report makes interesting reading, but keep in mind that they were
>>> specifically looking at SSDs with a smaller capacity (and cost) but they
>>> had to
>>> be reliable (after a 50+% failure rate with an OCZ model):
>>>
>>> http://lkcl.net/reports/ssd_analysis.html
>> Well as a fairly naive reader the above URL does seem to support
>> the contention that currently:
>> "Intel SSDs are special and present completely different performance
>> characteristics to all other SSDs "
> At the time of that report's writing, that may have been the case, but
> the drives mentioned are all pretty old models. (And it's worth noting
> that the Intel 320s they were testing turned out to have a firmware
> bug that caused complete data loss, although obviously that news broke
> after the report was created)
>
> SSD drives were still going through a maturation period back then..
> I'd say that current drives are considerably better.
So as of " 1 Jan 2014 " ?
thanks for the reply Rohan McLeod
_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
