> Hi all,
> 
> I'm curious after the recent storm about systemd to find out how many
> people
> have actually tried to use it?
> 
> I installed a test machine with CentOS 7 (which has systemd by default) to
> see
> if it causes any issues with the Slurm HPC job queuing system we use on our
> supercomputers.  The reason is that both want to use cgroups and (in our
> case)
> Slurm's need is greater than systemd's.
> 
> To my great surprise both my cats are still alive, there have been no
> unexplained solar eclipses and the world has not ended.   Oh, and Slurm
> continues to work as before.
> 

Having upgraded to Jessie at home, systemd has popped up everywhere.

It broke a few things, which I have posted before but will mention again:

. auto startup of mythtv. I was using inittab which is horrible but worked. A 
quick google showed me how to do it under systemd, and it is so much better. 
Inittab is a pain to try and get packages to maintain.
. serial console. Knowing that I was using system and that inittab wouldn't get 
me a serial console I figured I'd need to do some funky systemd magic to get it 
working. Turns out that I didn't need to do anything.

Anything else that systemd has done under the covers, I haven't noticed. I 
think I might have been affected by some bugs where openvswitch didn't start up 
properly or something and I ended up putting a manual "ifup -a" in a script 
somewhere to fix it, but that was a bug, not a broken-by-design-ism, and it's 
long since been fixed.

I think Linux has been missing proper service control for a long time. 
Different packages have thrown together half baked solutions where the init.d 
script starts a watcher process that starts the actual service, and restarts it 
if it stops for some reason (does mysql have this or am I thinking of something 
else?), but of course that involves a different config for every different 
service, and half the time doesn't work properly anyway because the developer 
hasn't considered various corner cases.

Whether systemd is the best solution to that I don't really know, and maybe 
Debian has been forced to make a choice too early.... only time will tell, but 
the previous implementation of service management was well broken, IMHO.

James

_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to