On 14/01/2015 8:40 PM, Chris Samuel wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:49:01 PM Andrew McGlashan wrote: > >> In any case, I have seen TB be absolutely awful with files on at least >> NTFS .... but I still use it, I won't use it with an SSD though at this >> stage, but I might one day. > > I've been running TB on 2 work laptops with SSDs for the last 5 years without > any issues.
I don't doubt that my use of TB is extreme and likely to be nothing like 99.99% of users. My own stores of emails has many 10's thousands of messages in lots of folders -- some folders have well over 100,000 messages. Debian lists alone in one aggregate folder has nearly 250,000 messages, those are collected from all groups I've subscribed over the years. Each group then has it's own folder as well (so lots of duplication). My Debian-user folder (it's own folder), has 145,470 messages right now, dating back to the 19th January, 2009. There is no doubt that alot of that bulk is now worthless, but TB is working, but I do, understandably have unique issues due to my extreme use of storage. If anyone has a greater store in their TB, I would be surprised. Cheers A. _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
