James Harper <[email protected]> writes: > Postgres is highly extensible. I wrote compatible types for my mssql emulator > to avoid exactly that problem (being Microsoft, they have their own ideas of > how types should behave, and also I could make the underlying data format > compatible with the wire format). > > I'd be doing a complete parse and rewrite of the language though, so > any of the language and type differences would be easily > solvable. Some of the other differences your links highlight around > foreign key and atomicity behaviour would be harder.
On the plus side, a lot of apps don't care that much if at all :) OTOH, it may not be worth the effort if it's just one simple app... but that doesn't mean it wouldn't be a *lot* of fun and a good challenge to try and do it :) -- Stewart Smith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
