On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 at 18:08 Andrew McGlashan < [email protected]> wrote:
> I've always thought that ZFS would be better than btrfs myself, but > now I'm not as convinced of that. > I have always heard people say ZFS is better, Oracle should support ZFS not btrfs, etc. Don't know what to think myself. > ZFS on BSD for sure, but btrfs on Linux ... probably better and will > be much better yet. The big risk, as far as I am concerned, is that > it relies too much on specific kernel versions and of course it relies > upon Linux too. For a number of reasons, I would be happier if this > was also available in the BSD world. > coreos stopped using btrfs by default. They say they encountered too many problems with it. https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/coreos-dev/NDEOXchAbuU
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
