Marcus Furlong wrote:

> On 29 July 2015 at 11:41, Peter Ross <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Using a newer kernel is out of question here - I have to use the latest
>> "Enterprise Linux" (CentOS 7) without patches.

> Does that include using kernels from other CentOS repos?

> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories

> The elrepo repository listed above has a mainline kernel that follows
> upstream stable releases, so no need for patching.

I wonder how safe it is to use these kernels, and whether it breaks the
userland.

>From the policy view, it somehow defeats the purpose of choosing an
Enterprise Linux (with well-tested software in their own "kernel/userland
universe") and then throwing out crucial parts of it.

I could put a FreeBSD kernel underneath then, it has a Linux kernel ABI,
and start deploying CentOS jails on ZFS;-)

https://wiki.freebsd.org/VIMAGE/Linux/CentOS55

I don't think I get away with this either;-)

Thanks
Peter


On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Marcus Furlong <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 29 July 2015 at 11:41, Peter Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Using a newer kernel is out of question here - I have to use the latest
> > "Enterprise Linux" (CentOS 7) without patches.
>
> Does that include using kernels from other CentOS repos?
>
>    http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
>
> The elrepo repository listed above has a mainline kernel that follows
> upstream stable releases, so no need for patching.
>
>
> In case anyone is interested, openSUSE also has the same type of
> stable kernel repo here:
>
>    http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/stable/standard/
>
> and the Ubuntu has it's mainline kernel ppa:
>
>    http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/
>
> Regards,
> Marcus.
> --
> Marcus Furlong
>
_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to