On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 04:34:40PM +1100, Joel W. Shea via luv-main wrote: > > http://lists.luv.asn.au/pipermail/luv-talk/2015-November/003584.html > > In that thread, I have attempted to convince the list administrator to > use dmarc_moderation_action *instead of* from_is_list, as recommended by > the Mailman documentation; effectively only rewriting the "From:" field > where necessary, and I believe that's an acceptable compromise to many > more people than the current solution.
that's a not-unreasonable compromise. it only mangles messages where the alternative would be to have it bounce or be discarded....and, most importantly, doesn't munge other messages where DMARC is not an issue. > Only where the message has been sent from a domain with a restrictive > DMARC policy like dmarc_moderation_action does; not every single > message, as from_is_list does. i'm in favour of it, as a compromise. i'd prefer not to mangle mail just to pander to giant corporations broken non-standards, but at least dmarc_moderation_action seems to do minimal damage. craig -- craig sanders <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
