On 13/01/2016 8:42 PM, Erik Christiansen via luv-main wrote: > On 13.01.16 20:09, Tony Langdon via luv-main wrote: >> On 13/01/2016 10:31 AM, Brian May wrote: >>> Tony Langdon via luv-main <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> On closer observation, it started with the message from you that I >>>> replied to, and it's only you. Another coincidence is that the Subject: >>>> header hasn't been munged in this thread, yet everyone else's posts >>>> still have the Subject: munging. >>> >>> I don't see any subject munging for any posts on luv-main. >> >> I got it wrong, was actually referring to From: address munging. > > Nah, I wouldn't hold my breath. Hints on that one have been going to > /dev/null since last year. It seems we're all supposed to undo the crap > individually at our ends.
I'm just mystified as to why the thread that Russell's message started is not being From: munged, whereas all else is. Though your message is munged, and Reply List is working perfectly. It wasn't so much the From: munging that was bothering me, but the inconsistent reply behaviour (I dislike Reply All, because of the extra emails it generates, much prefer Reply List). -- 73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL http://vkradio.com _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
