On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 08:34:35PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:09:29 PM Joel W. Shea via luv-main wrote: > > There may (or may not) have been discussion amongst the committee > > [...] > > There wasn't a discussion because no-one on the committee felt the > need for a discussion. I suggested that we have one but it seems that > no-one had any problems with it. I enabled it on the committee list > before luv-talk and everyone there seemed happy.
I guess that works in-lieu of a discussion. Thanks for the explaination, I appreciate that. > For comparison the committee discussion about moving the LUV server > (probably the most important issue the committee has discussed in the > past year or so) was held on Google Hangouts and we only got 5/9 in > attendance. Are there any minutes taken/published for committee meetings? Are they even necessary? Other committee members feel free to chime in here. > The history of LUV shows that asking for commentary from members > before making a change is something you only do if you don't want to > make a change. Ha ha, fair enough, I can sympathise with that :-) > It took us years to get public archives for the LUV lists with many > discussions like this along the way. Your memory on that issue is obviously much better than mine, thanks for the context.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
