On 27 April 2017 at 02:45, Andrew McGlashan via luv-main <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24/04/17 10:24, David via luv-main wrote: >> >> In the message I sent before the one above, I gave what seemed to me >> the cleanest way to do what you originally asked, using pre-increment >> as I suggested in my first reply:
[...] > Yes, I did see that and I tried it out; pre-increment gives problems > just the same as post-increment. So that wasn't a solution. Thanks for the update. [...] > Using "((i++)) || true" allows me to say, I don't care if the arithmetic > result is zero, I am handling the condition for loop exit outside of > that result and the actual return from the ((i++)) is totally irrelevant. Thanks for the feedback, I'm glad you found that useful. _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main
