On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Sara Marcondes wrote: > I'm not sure that I understand the blog post. In what way are make and > Airflow alike... at all? Airflow manages dependencies in the sense that > it can build directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks that depend on each > other in an execution order and output sense, but that isn't the same as > managing build or output dependencies, which I understand to be make's > bread and butter. Airflow *is* a task scheduler. That isn't an > "additional feature" over the core software. Everything else around it > is about managing and running those tasks in potentially highly > available environments, and is deeply configurable for use with remote > executors and other advanced use cases. > > It would be absurd to try to use it as a make replacement, unless I'm missing > something huge about what make is capable of and used for.
You've just given me an evil idea - re-implement `make` in systemd. -- Tim Connors _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
