Thanks for the feedback so far. I'd love to hear more. Also FYI, I've started integrating luvi into luvit. You can see the progress and instructions for how to test in the `luvi-up` branch: https://github.com/luvit/luvit/tree/luvi-up
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Graham Wakefield <[email protected]> wrote: > Fully concur. > > On Oct 24, 2014, at 12:03 PM, Ross Bencina <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On 23/10/2014 7:31 AM, Brian Akins wrote: > >> I've never been a fan of the callback style. It'd be nice to have an > >> option to write "synchronous looking" code that actually ran > asynchronously > > > > +1 > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "luvit" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected]. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "luvit" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "luvit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
