On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 18:10 -0700, Rob wrote: > Is that a configuration that works for other people? > with no separate real servers? I hadn't ever tried that...
I'm running a LVS DR Localnode right now. Works fine. > Despite what Sal said, I would definitely do anything you can to separate > sync > traffic from LVS Dir traffic because it will simplify your initial > troubleshooting Well, he was suggesting moving the traffic to another interface so it can take up 20% of the interface and it wouldn't matter, and he wouldn't have to deal with it, which I was saying, and he already figured, was probably not a good idea because it just masks the problem and doesn't really solve anything. It sounds like he's still setting things up, so there's likely no other real traffic on this interface (except, perhaps, ssh traffic from him logging in) so it might not be necessary to separate it for troubleshooting, but it would help to be sure that all the traffic he was seeing on whatever tools he's using was only from the directors. -- Sal Tepedino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
