On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Rudd, Michael wrote:
It seems no-one knows. I'm replying so you don't think we're
ignoring you.
Julian, Horms,
Any ideas?
Thanks Joe
After some more digging it appears this is related to the OPS or One
Packet Scheduling feature. With the OPS feature turned off, the source
IP address is correctly SNATed to my VIP. With the OPS feature on and
working correctly(which we need for our UDP service), the source IP
address isn't correctly SNATed.
Is anybody aware of the code for this? I assume its related to not
looking up the connection in the hash table anymore with OPS thus not
SNATing. Maybe an iptables rule coudl fix this possibly?
Thanks for any help
Mike
________________________________
From: Rudd, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 3:10 PM
To: 'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'
Subject: RE: SNAT / Masquerading problems using LVS-NAT
Update has anyone seen this? I am basically seeing using LVS-NAT that
the return packets are not being SNATed with the LVS directors VIP but
have a source IP address of the realservers. I saw this work in the 2.4
kernel but havent been able to make it work in 2.6. Any clues?
Thanks
Mike
________________________________
From: Rudd, Michael
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 9:10 AM
To: 'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'
Subject: SNAT / Masquerading problems using LVS-NAT
My current setup has 1 director and 2 servers behind it. Heres the dump
from ipvsadm.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sysconfig]# ipvsadm
IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
-> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
UDP 192.168.67.213:domain rr ops
-> dnsa-c:domain Masq 1 0 110935
-> dnsa-d:domain Masq 1 0 110934
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sysconfig]#
LVS is working the way it should except return packets are not the
correct source IP address. They should be from 192.168.67.213 which is
the address of the service. Instead they are the address of the real
server. This worked in kernel 2.4 when I tested it 2 months ago. Now its
broken in my 2.6.18 kernel.
Heres also a dump from ip addr. We are doing our dns traffic based on
bond1.201.
...
8: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,10000> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
link/ether 00:04:23:c5:63:fc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
9: bond1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,10000> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
link/ether 00:04:23:c5:63:fd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
10: bond2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
11: bond3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
12: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,10000> mtu 1500
qdisc noqueue
link/ether 00:04:23:c5:63:fc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.66.214/24 brd 192.168.66.255 scope global bond0.200
inet 192.168.66.244/24 brd 192.168.66.255 scope global secondary
bond0.200
13: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,10000> mtu 1500
qdisc noqueue
link/ether 00:04:23:c5:63:fc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.2.104/24 brd 192.168.2.255 scope global bond0.202
inet 192.168.2.101/24 brd 192.168.2.255 scope global secondary
bond0.202
14: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,10000> mtu 1500
qdisc noqueue
link/ether 00:04:23:c5:63:fd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.67.214/24 brd 192.168.67.255 scope global bond1.201
inet 192.168.67.213/24 brd 192.168.67.255 scope global secondary
bond1.201
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sysconfig]#
I've tried the ip_route_me_harder patch I found here
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-NAT.html#brow
nfield but it doesnt appear to work correctly at least for me. Anybody
got any clues as to what broke in 2.6 for this?
Thanks
Mike
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected]
Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected]
Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
