> I think that is right too. If so, you just need to work out why nanny thinks > that the real servers on the other ports are down.
This is stumping me. I can see the services alive and running. > I don't think that you need these iptables rules, LVS shoud do NAT > without them. Someone also said this a while ago? Is this related or perhaps something to do with iptables itself? Mike _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
