On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 15:40 +0100, Mark Wadham wrote: > Is this a bad thing?
No. But it means you need to do extra $stuff to make it work. Briefly, in a one-network LVS-NAT the replies from the realservers will try to get back to the clients via the most direct route. This means that they bypass the director, therefore the reverse NAT translation doesn't happen, and the connection hangs up and eventually times out. You need to force all responses from realservers back through the director for LVS-NAT to work. There's several good explanations of how to do this in the HOWTO and the list archives. If you can't find them, or they're not very clear, feel free to ask again. Graeme _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
