Rio,
> If so, is there a 'best model'? I suspect the NAT model would be what we need.
>   
Or do the NAT on your firewall and use DR.
> The control box would be a 2 processor dual-core opteron so it effectively 
> would have 4 processors and maybe 8gb or more ram.
>   
Good grief! Why not just use 2 servers  P4, 1GB RAM (or less) control 
boxes as a high availability pair?
> Do you think we could get away with one 'control' box considering the 
> bandwidth usage? All internal networks are gigabit. If needed we can easily 
> feed the control box via more than one 'public' interface separated by 
> networks.
>   
DR yes, NAT probably you said 70GB/mo each? doesn't sound a lot and 
doesn't mean much how many GB/s & connections/s?
>
> Once I have some guidelines, I will know where/how to study and begin 
> implementation/testing. At this moment I am ignorant of clustering 
> technology, I only have an idea what I want to do.
>
>   
Always a good way to start.

Regards,
Malcolm.

_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected]
Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

Reply via email to