I'm looking at implementing one of these two LVS methods. So as I understand it if I choose LVS-DR then I'm limited to having the LB and RS on the same physical network. But if I choose LVS-TUN then I have to be prepared to absorb the overhead associated with the repackaging. My questions: Is there some doc that quantifies the level of overhead for LVS-TUN in comparison to LVS-DR? In terms of scalability is there some absolute upper limits for either LVS-TUN or LVS-DR?
Gerry _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
