Ben Hollingsworth wrote: > Howdy Gerry, > > Did you ever figure out a solution to your LVS topology problem that you > posted about on LVS-users a few weeks back? I'm in the same boat right > now. I believe need to use LVS-NAT (not DR) because some of my real > servers will be Windows. The primary apps need to talk through the > director, but I have a few services (like SSH and backups) for which I > need to contact each real server directly. I'm a little fuzzy on the > right way to hook things up to make this happen, or if it's even possible. > Ben, My original problem was that I had a lot of existing services like NAS, Backup servicing, ssh, that I didn't want to reconfigure just to implement LVS. Well, the way I think I'm going to end up is with doing NAT in an upfront router and then doing LVS-TUN or LVS-DR on a separate box. This should let me keep everything in one network address space and most of my existing service setup should still work ok.
Gerry _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
