On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Nick Stephens wrote: > Hi all, > > I am quite new to LVS, and learned about it initially as a > part of Redhat Enterprise Servers. Because of that I > initially thought that redhat was the primary resource for > clustering and load balancing,
We do the same on our site :-) > The one thing that I do not see on the website, presumably > because it is opinion based, is a comparison of the > various resources available to achieve HA load balancing. There hasn't been a technical shootoff to decide, so it remains a matter of opinion. Both ldirectord and keepalived work and are used by people on the mailing list. > Pretty straightforward for this setup, right? yes > So if you had to set this up and sell it as a reliable HA > system to your boss(es), which software package would you > use for this? Piranha, Ultramonkey, Keepalived? my opinions on Piranha are in http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.unsupported.html#pbs_nutshell Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
