Hi and thanks for answering > > As you can see the realserver 192.168.100.32:80 is listed > > as Local. Which DO make sence since that realserver is > > local to the director im issuing the command on. > > do you have 4 boxes or 2?
I have 2 hardware servers. > > > Now here comes the problem: If I try to connect to the > > service, it works 50% of the time. If it hits the Local > > realserver everything works, but the other 50% of the > > attemps it tries the other real server, and that just > > fails. > > is the route set correctly for the 2nd realserver? I guess that depends on what "correctly" means? This is the routing table for each hardware box: Server 1: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 192.168.100.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 Server2: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 192.168.100.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 > Can you not send alternate blank lines? Hmm I can if I know what you mean, do you mean the message format of my first post? If I had varying line space I'm sory there was a lot of cut and pasting involved. I will try not to do so again. I can telnet to all the ip's involved from both directors. So I don't think it's a routing issue per say. If I connect to the virtual ip (192.168.100.35) from the director I always get to the local realserver though. I guess that is because the machine has the ip itself. If I use the realserver ip's from either director I can connect fine to both of them. So I'm not really sure what I can try and change to debug this? Best regards Jonas Larsen _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
