On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Fernando Gomes wrote: > I Joe, thanks for your reply, my comments are on the body of the message > >> >> you'll have less oppotunities for trouble if you use >> secondary IPs. > Ok, but can you clarify why?
HOWTO: the section on iproute2 tools >>> your opinion. I'm using also OpenVZ on all servers (including the >>> Loadbalancers), but LVS is installed on the Hardware Node, not using >>> OpenVZ at all. The problem I have is if I put a VE (virtual environment >>> ~= virtual machine) on the standby loadbalancer and run on it a >>> realserver. >> >> I don't understand this sentence or know what the "it" is. > Sorry, I'll try to clarify it, since this is the root of the problem. > I'm running a virtual machine in the loadbalancer node that is not > active (the standby loadbalancer), and that virtual machine is running a > realserver (webserver) (the same virtual machine on the active > loadbalancer works well). The test page requests work well, they come > from the same network. The client requests that are transformed by the > director are received, but the answer goes directly to the router, does > not return to the director. a hairy setup :-) I expect the routing is being overridden by icmp redirects, hence my comment about one-network LVS-NAT >> does your setup appear to be a one-network LVS-NAT (see >> HOWTO)? > Physically it is similar (all nodes on the same physical network), so it's one network Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
