On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Sean E. Millichamp wrote: > Why can't it? All packets flow through it (I'm in NAT mode)..
in that case, never mind. I forget what an InActConn is in NAT at the moment. > If I know I can only support 25 Active connections to a > real-server then how can I reliably pick a limit? I wait till it overflows and then back off one at a time > Maybe there is still something I am missing, but I feel > like matching thresholds only on the active connection > count should at least be a settable option. There's only a few people using it so we don't have a lot of experience with it. I think Ratz (who I expect is the author of the threshhold code), is the only one I know who's using it. If you want to try with ActConn, I don't see any reason of the top of my head why you'd get into a whole lot of trouble. I wouldn't treat the threshhold options as cast in stone by supreme all knowing people. I think Ratz is the only one who has been using it. (Ratz of course is all knowing, but he was probably using LVS-DR.) > I may look at what it would take for me to patch that > behavior into my local IPVS module. good luck. Let us know one way or another how it goes. Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
