> I appreciate that this is fairly obvious True, but thanks for the input anyway. Like I said in an earlier message, the computer running LVS/ldirectord is working at less than 10% CPU, so I'm going to guess that my 60 virtual servers are not making it work too hard. However, it's often unsafe to assume that you'll get linear scaling. For all I knew, there could have been a known crunch point where the LVS or ldirectord code begins to step on itself and things come to a grinding halt. That would be an very unpleasant surprise. :-)
-- Eric Robinson Director of Information Technology Physician Select Management, LLC 775.720.2082 Disclaimer - October 31, 2007 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not represent those of Physician Select Management (PSM) or Physician's Managed Care (PMC). Warning: Although the message sender has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, neither PSM nor PMC can accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
